Military Difference.
LOUD SEYMOUIt JUSTIFIED. By Telegraph—Pross Association—Copyright London, Sept. 11. Lords Mints and Lansdowne supported General Hutton’s .action in ignoring General Lord Win. Seymour’s jurisdiction over contingents on the point of ilutton s attitude, Lord Seymour resigned, on the ground that he was bereft of authority, and a Hoard of Enquiry hold in London has now vindicated him.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19010912.2.31
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 211, 12 September 1901, Page 2
Word Count
59Military Difference. Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 211, 12 September 1901, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in