Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Contradictory Evidence.

A CHARGE OF DRUNKENNESS. j Times Wairoa Correspondent.] At a sitting of the Justices’ Court held on the 2,Sth August, Messrs J. W. Sargisson and G. Britnell, .7. P.'s being on the Bench, the following case was heard : A. Poyzer v. Christopher Eerneil, on a charge of drunkenness. Defendant pleaded not guilty. A. Poyzer deposed : I am a publican residing at Wairoa. Defendant was in my employ as cook. On Sunday I charged him with being drunk. Ho went away on Sunday morning, returning at night the worse for liquor. I reported the matter to the police between 8 and 9 p.m. I gave him one pint of beer between 10 and 11. a.m., which is an allowance I give him each day. lie had no more in tho house to my knowledge. He might have had beer in his room, but I do not know. He was decidedly the worse of liquor, but I could not swear whether ho was capable of doing his work or not.

By defendant: Bid von not servo mo with beer on Saturday night ? Witness : Am not positive, but I saw my son serving you with a bottio of beer. Daniel Clifford deposed: I remember seeing accuse lon Sunday between 6 and 7. sitting on Poyzcr's doorstep, and to my knowledge ho was the worse of liquor. I knew he was drunk because ha could not walk straight when coming down the road. I could not say whether he was capable of looking after himself or not. Defendant deposed : I was engaged as cook at .Mr Poyzcr’s on the Saturday night. I bad several drinks. On going to bed [ purchased two bottles of beer from Mr Poyzcr’s bar. On Sunday morning I bad two pints at the bar, and paid for them; had no drink after then. I left the hotel, and bad a walk up and down the street after dinner, and was perfectly sober when I returned again in the evening. Any signs I had of drink must have been from the effects of what I had on Saturday night, and the two drinks I had Sunday morning. Walter Davis, insurance agent, deposed: I saw’ defendant at three o'clock on Sunday afternoon, sitting down in Hewitt’s hotel, and as far as I could judge the man was perfectly sober. Feter Jowson, tailor, stated : I saw the defendant between 3 and 4 on Saturday afternoon, and he was perfectly sober then.

T. Hewitt, hotelkeeper, Wairoa, deposed : I know the defendant. He was in my hotel on Sunday afternoon, and was then sober. Ho left and came back about 8 o’clock, and asked for a bed, stating that he had left Mr Poyzer’s. I showed him to his room, and from appearances the man was then perfectly sober. The case was dismissed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19010903.2.41

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 203, 3 September 1901, Page 4

Word Count
470

Contradictory Evidence. Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 203, 3 September 1901, Page 4

Contradictory Evidence. Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 203, 3 September 1901, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert