Contradictory Evidence.
A CHARGE OF DRUNKENNESS. j Times Wairoa Correspondent.] At a sitting of the Justices’ Court held on the 2,Sth August, Messrs J. W. Sargisson and G. Britnell, .7. P.'s being on the Bench, the following case was heard : A. Poyzer v. Christopher Eerneil, on a charge of drunkenness. Defendant pleaded not guilty. A. Poyzer deposed : I am a publican residing at Wairoa. Defendant was in my employ as cook. On Sunday I charged him with being drunk. Ho went away on Sunday morning, returning at night the worse for liquor. I reported the matter to the police between 8 and 9 p.m. I gave him one pint of beer between 10 and 11. a.m., which is an allowance I give him each day. lie had no more in tho house to my knowledge. He might have had beer in his room, but I do not know. He was decidedly the worse of liquor, but I could not swear whether ho was capable of doing his work or not.
By defendant: Bid von not servo mo with beer on Saturday night ? Witness : Am not positive, but I saw my son serving you with a bottio of beer. Daniel Clifford deposed: I remember seeing accuse lon Sunday between 6 and 7. sitting on Poyzcr's doorstep, and to my knowledge ho was the worse of liquor. I knew he was drunk because ha could not walk straight when coming down the road. I could not say whether he was capable of looking after himself or not. Defendant deposed : I was engaged as cook at .Mr Poyzcr’s on the Saturday night. I bad several drinks. On going to bed [ purchased two bottles of beer from Mr Poyzcr’s bar. On Sunday morning I bad two pints at the bar, and paid for them; had no drink after then. I left the hotel, and bad a walk up and down the street after dinner, and was perfectly sober when I returned again in the evening. Any signs I had of drink must have been from the effects of what I had on Saturday night, and the two drinks I had Sunday morning. Walter Davis, insurance agent, deposed: I saw’ defendant at three o'clock on Sunday afternoon, sitting down in Hewitt’s hotel, and as far as I could judge the man was perfectly sober. Feter Jowson, tailor, stated : I saw the defendant between 3 and 4 on Saturday afternoon, and he was perfectly sober then.
T. Hewitt, hotelkeeper, Wairoa, deposed : I know the defendant. He was in my hotel on Sunday afternoon, and was then sober. Ho left and came back about 8 o’clock, and asked for a bed, stating that he had left Mr Poyzer’s. I showed him to his room, and from appearances the man was then perfectly sober. The case was dismissed.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19010903.2.41
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 203, 3 September 1901, Page 4
Word Count
470Contradictory Evidence. Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 203, 3 September 1901, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.