Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Crown’s Challenge To Magistrate’s Ruling

(P.A.) PALMERSTON N„ Aug. 10. In the Supreme Court the Crown is challenging the decision of Mr. J. R. Herd, S.M., who recently held that in the absence of an analysis of liquid required under the' Licensing Amendment Act, he would not assume that the contents of a glass in the possession of a man in an hotel after hours was intoxicating liquor. • Crown counsel contended that an analysis was only required in respect of fermented, distilled or spirituous liquor and not for spirits, wine and beer, etc.

Counsel argued that the magistrate had been wrong in his grammatical reading of the particular section of the Act and on the presumed intention of the legislature. Decision was reserved.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GISH19490810.2.24

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Herald, Volume LXXVI, Issue 23020, 10 August 1949, Page 4

Word Count
123

Crown’s Challenge To Magistrate’s Ruling Gisborne Herald, Volume LXXVI, Issue 23020, 10 August 1949, Page 4

Crown’s Challenge To Magistrate’s Ruling Gisborne Herald, Volume LXXVI, Issue 23020, 10 August 1949, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert