Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LOSS ON EXCHANGE

POPULAR MISCONCEPTION Apparently there are still people who believe that the banks charge £25 for “sending” £IOO to London, says the Australasian Insurance and Banking Record in its latest issue, in commenting on a suggestion that remittances of bombing raid relief funds to London should be made “without any deduction for exchange.” the first answer to such a suggestion. the journal says, is that the banks are already transmitting patriotic funds to London free of charge for their services, which is usually about 10s in £IOO. The second is that the banks have to pay £125 Australian for a £IOO banknote in sterling, and to ask them to sell it for £IOO Australian is unreasonable, to say the least of it. . Every intelligent person ought to know by now that the £25 premium goes into the pockets of exporters, who receive £125 Australian for every £IOO sterling worth of goods sold in London. The journal recalls a proposal made to English cricketers some years ago during a test tour of Australia that, in save losing £25 In every £125 of their earnings there when buying a bank draft, they should buy wool, shin it to London, and sell it there. The financial novice who thought of Ibis brilliant idea, it adds, was apparently not aware that £125 worth of wool in Australia would bring ohlv £IOO in L0nd0n..... . - -

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GISH19401022.2.26

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVII, Issue 20384, 22 October 1940, Page 5

Word Count
231

LOSS ON EXCHANGE Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVII, Issue 20384, 22 October 1940, Page 5

LOSS ON EXCHANGE Gisborne Herald, Volume LXVII, Issue 20384, 22 October 1940, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert