Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAN CAN BURN DOWN OWN HOME

SYDNEY, October 23.

A man was the ruler of his castle and could do what he liked with it. A charge of arson could not be sustained in a case in which he burned down his home unless there was proof of intent to injure. Counsel for Harold Thomas Godsell, aged 54, a market gardener, made this submission in the Sydney Quarter Sessions yesterday, when Godsell was charged with maliciously setting fire to his home with intent to injure. Acting Judge Lamara agreed with this view and directed the jury to acquit the defendant. He said that in an arson case it was necesary for the Crown to prove intent to injure or defraud. This had not been done. When questioned by the police, he said: “You have nothing on me. I can burn down my own place if I want to,” which statement was substantially true.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19471024.2.68

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 24 October 1947, Page 7

Word Count
153

MAN CAN BURN DOWN OWN HOME Greymouth Evening Star, 24 October 1947, Page 7

MAN CAN BURN DOWN OWN HOME Greymouth Evening Star, 24 October 1947, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert