Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JUDGE ANNOYED

JURY ACQUITS OLD OFFENDER LONDON, June 1. When a jury at Dorset Assizes today brought in a verdict of not guilty against James Morton, 31, a barber, who said his correct name was James Morton Marlow, Mr. Justice Hawke said to him: “That means you may go. But I know, and you know, how often you have been in prison. Is it 15 times?”

Morton agreed that it was. Mr. Justice Hawke, nodding towards the jury, continued: “You see, they did not know that. You had bet-

ter be careful about getting into windows in future.”

Turning to the jury the judge observed: ’’Fifteen times! And you believed that story.” He discharged them from further duty and added: “You can go, and you need not come back.” Morton was accused of entering a house with intent to commit a felony and of “breaking out” of the house. Miss Winifred Golder, of Wimborne road, Bournemouth, stated that at 11.15 p.m. she found Morton hiding behind the curtains in a ground-floor bedroom. He mumbled something about having followed a blonde girl into the house.

She agreed with Mr. Guy W. Willett, defending, that one of the occupants of the house was blonde.

Morton, in evidence, declared that on the previous night he lost money when he went to a Wimborne-road flat with two girls. On the night of

the alleged offence he saw a girl like one of his previous companions and she threatened to fetch a, policeman when he spoke to her. He was not sure if she was the same girl. When she went into a house and no lights were switched on he concluded that she did not use the lights because she was the girl

he was looking for. The judge, summing up, said it was for the jury to decide if the story about the blonde girl was a mere excuse. It was a somewhat unusual method of getting back £2/10/-. Why did not Mbrton use the front door? Morton was discharged.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19390718.2.28

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 18 July 1939, Page 5

Word Count
337

JUDGE ANNOYED Greymouth Evening Star, 18 July 1939, Page 5

JUDGE ANNOYED Greymouth Evening Star, 18 July 1939, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert