Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COMMODITY COUNCILS

AUCKLAND FARMERS’ ATTITUDE. [PEK I’HESS ASSOCIATION.] AUCKLAND, May 17. I .The proposals adopted at the Empire Primary Producers’ Conference held in Sydney last month formed the basis of a. long debate at the conference of the Auckland provincial branch which centred on the proposed establishment of commodity councils by Empire producer organisations, lasted for more than two hours. The debate at several times became heated, and the president (Mr. 11. 0. Mellsop) had several times to call representatives

to order. The decision made at the Sydney conference that Empire producing organisations should co-operate to establish commodity councils designed to work for the prevention of avoidable gluts on the London market and resultant instability of price levels and speculation was criticised by Mr. v. Goodfellow, managing directed of Amalgamated Dairies, Ltd. The setting up of such councils, Mr. Goodfellow said, would relieve the New Zealand Government of the responsibility of working for the maintenance in London of free amt unrestricted markets for New Zealand dairy pio-

duce. Replying to Dlr. Goodfellow, Mr. A\. TV. Mulholland, president of the New Zealand Farmers’ Union, who was one of the Dominion delegates to the Sydney conference, said that there was no provision made for any commodity council to act as negotiator between Governments. The commodity councils had been planned to regulate supplies from the producing countries, so that restrictions might be avoided. “I consider,” lie said, “that Mr. Good-

fellow’s apprehensions are unfounded. The recommendations adopted at the Sydney conference were definitely in the interests of our dairy export industry.” j Mr. Mellsop, who was also present lat the Sydney conference, supported ) Mr. Mulholland’s contentions. The following motion was carried: "The ratification by the Auckland branch of the Farmers’ Union of the proposals brought down by the primary producers’ conference shall not ■lbe held to attach or apply to any particular industry, until or unless that ■ | industry shall signify its approval. I, Toward the close of the session, Mr. Goodfellow said he was sure the pro-

posal to set up a commodity council in Loudon would not be accepted by the dairy industry in New Zealand.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19380518.2.9

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 18 May 1938, Page 3

Word Count
354

COMMODITY COUNCILS Greymouth Evening Star, 18 May 1938, Page 3

COMMODITY COUNCILS Greymouth Evening Star, 18 May 1938, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert