Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SURGEON SUED

EXONERATED BY JUDGE

LONDON, November 11

When Air. Justice Tucker- in the King’s Bench Division exonerated Harley Street specialist) Horace? Powell Winsbury-Wliite from any negligence in aii operation performed four years- ago, lie saved all'- patients o£ : surgeons from the risk- of highei Winshury-Whife had! been- sued for damages by Mi'- , Arthur William Morris, 61-year-old commercial traveller,, of- Arundel Gardens, Gooch mayes. Essex. Mr. Morris’s case ■was that a. drainage tube was left in his body, for .four months after the operation, and as. a result his health liad been ruined'. . , The operation was performed in. St. Paul’s Hospital, EnilelT Street, 01 which- Mr. Winsbury-Wliite is honorary surgeon and where Mr. Mon is was a. private patient, lli' crosswxamination, Mr. Wihsbury-Wliito said that ho did not hold himself responsible for' things doiio to his-' patient: in. his absence. Mr. Justice Tucker, giving judgment with 1 costs 1 lor Mr. Wiiisbury--Wliit'e, said: “There is not tlie slightest foundation for any suggestion 1 that Mr. W'insubry-White in any way failed in his duty to Mr. Morris.” AFTER-CA RE PROBLEM Rack-ill-his Harley Street liouie Mr. Wiusbury-White said: “The whole of the medical profession was watching this case. The. physician, like the surgeon, must- leave a certain amount of the after-care of the patient, to- tlie staff of the hospital—people in whom, as a- rule, he has the greatest confidence.

“If the case had gone against me it would', have meant that a .surgeon would.-, have limited the .number of hid patients in' private beds of hospitals. “That would most likely have meant an iiiui'ease in the charges lor opciations to compensate the surgeon for the extra, work- involved in looking after the patient and the risk of action for- negligence.” Mr. Win-sbury-Whitc expressed, his sympathy, for Mr. Morri si “the iti'ffi df this most unfortunate misadjventure.” ~ Mr. Morris left the Court on the sarni of his 1 devoted wife-. H-e said the costs 1 of the case would amount to £l5OO.

Ho added: “Where the money is to' come from. 1 don’t know. I shall not be able- to go- for a holiday, though 1 feel the need- of one. 1 shall have to return to my work immediately, and hope for the best.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19371211.2.12

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 11 December 1937, Page 3

Word Count
373

SURGEON SUED Greymouth Evening Star, 11 December 1937, Page 3

SURGEON SUED Greymouth Evening Star, 11 December 1937, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert