Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHEYLESMORE DIVORCE

CASE FOR. RESPONDENT. (Australian & N.Z. Cable Assn.) LONDON, Decembei - 1. Evidence was given by Lord Cheylesmore in the dase in which Lady formerly Nora Parker, an Australian, is petitioning for a divorce from her husband, whom she married in 1914 when a chorus girl, almost fresh from Tasmania. Lofid Cheylesmore gave evidence that he first met his wife through a friend. He telephoned and asked her to tea. They had not met previously. Lord Cheylesmore sought to show that, owing to the conditions ■of their life in Canada, his wife’s mind had weakened. He said that she also became much under the influence of her mother. He described the house in which they lived as “a .■good bungalow—as good as anything out West.” He had chosen Canada as his future home, and he was returning there immediately. Counsel quoted from a letter written by Lord Cheylesmore to a friend In England, saying: ‘‘Life with her is impossible. Sooner or later there is bound to be a smash.” The Dowager Lady Cheylesmore gave evidence. The remarkable feature' of the Dowager’s evidence was her -Statement to the effect that she had heard of a plot in'which the wife df the respondent was involved, •to produce a child by someone else, because' she could not have one by her husband. The Dowager said she had never taxed the wife with this, though witness had grounds for believing it. Witness denied that she had interfered between her son and her daughter-' in-law, but said she was always kind and considerate to the wife. The hearing was adjourned. OVERSEAS JURISDICTION. i- LONDON, December 1. In the House of Commons, the Under-Secretary for India, Earl Winterton, moved the second reading of the Indian and Colonial Divorce Jurisdiction Bill, conferring on the Indian and Dominion Courts jurisdiction in certain cases in respect of the dissolution of the marriages the parties to which are domiciled in England and Scotland, though living in India or in a Dominion, and also validating decrees granted. The bill was read the second time.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19261203.2.26

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 3 December 1926, Page 5

Word Count
343

CHEYLESMORE DIVORCE Greymouth Evening Star, 3 December 1926, Page 5

CHEYLESMORE DIVORCE Greymouth Evening Star, 3 December 1926, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert