VETO AND TARIFF REFORM.

Greymouth Evening Star, 8 April 1910, Page 4

VETO AND TARIFF REFORM.

Tin-: mbf.rabs dabby thf DAY. A SMAi.L ALAJuKiTY. i j>l;lt eIIKSS ASSOCIATION COPY lUIIIIT.] Beceived this day at 8.30 a in. LONDON, April 7. Tin* .Morning l/anier, .in referring i" a I.nhliy ni.'iiulir that- Hi" Oo einmenl ,j, s not intend to save i 0-at 1 10.-k the two Houses by an appeal to tin' ,11 r, 111 ■■, stains that il is in 11 <• i* tin'll tin- tiovciiinu.nl slum hi break up anil 1„. reformed tlian lhe couni ly b-driven to another aimless dissolution. ! a ■'■ II ('ominous, .Mi 1 ialdane moved tlio iirst veto resolution, lie an feed it was unfortunate to have 1,, introduce written provisions into an unwritten const il ni ion, tin: when a Invaclt of such magnitude "-a- made uii limit, the Lords' assurance ti:at it would not he n pealed th- Commons would he nnworlln of tin ir traditions it the.' failed to deal with lb- situation. If thi,' Liberals failed 1U -slabljs.li a real revising second chamber tii-. Conservatives, under the guise ol i, i,. im, would strengthen the luT.dc tan principle. Mr ihamb-t la in replied 'hat the Liberals reform of the I .olds "as a sham and only referred to in otd-i to i, ( . sir F tlivy and lion. Mr Hal dam- a shad ov of tinning mi oiin-e Mr Ilainlilni Beni; gave nu'ice to mo. . "That tiscal n form is necessary, , on; t ■ Lit ign tariffs hindering Hrit:.i, trade and aggravating mphi.v ■ men'." M/ A. Si< rev seconded. and declared that all petty s juahlde;. were worthless as compared with (lie failing of British laannfar- • nrers .and the mis. ties of chronic unemployment. 11- predicted a change won hi come throiigli the com.binat ion of tariff reformers and British trade unions. . . Sir J. Kemp moved and .dr .1 A. Sinn is seconded a fleet r uh>_ anumdwhich was carried by 200 to 2V2. 'i'lie Nationalists abstained 'font vot-