CORRESPONDENCE.
■ • COUNTY COUNCIL CRITICISM. | TO THE EDITOR OF THE STAR. S"'.> — In your report of Saturday's ' leetmg of the Kiwitea County Council ne Councillor stated that "Every ■ 'ouncillor seemed to made it his pecial care to see that all parts of !:e county were treated fairly." Well, ■ir, in this district there is a man ith a large family who, every winter . re eighteen years, has had to splodge lirough 20 chains of deep mud in ' i-'ler to reach a metalled road. They \rtamly seem to have distorted ideas f fairness. Another Councillor sym- : athises with settlers wanting a ridge. Then; why don't they bridge < w Kiwitea river at Upper Beacons- ' dd, on one of the County's main >ads? Because it is much fairer to >grade hills on other main roads in Inch 'Councillors are especially in- I srested than to bridge a road in ,i Inch no Councillors seem to be in- 1 srested. I am, etc., , R. 0. French. Te Pari, Cunningham's, March 23. 1
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS19080325.2.35
Bibliographic details
Feilding Star, Volume II, Issue 530, 25 March 1908, Page 4
Word Count
167CORRESPONDENCE. Feilding Star, Volume II, Issue 530, 25 March 1908, Page 4
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in