Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRIDGE OR TUNNEL?

NEW YORK ARGUMENT ENDED LINKING BATTERY PARK AND BROOKLYN Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright WASHINGTON, July 18. A long-drawn argument whether New York should have a bridge or a tunnel linking the Battery and BrookIvn was ended by the Secretary for War, Mr Henry Woodring, who forbade a proposed 80,000,000d0l bridge on the ground that it would constitute a hazard and block access to the sea if destroyed in wartime. Mr Woodring also commented that the two existing bridges spanning East River are potential hazards and should be replaced with tunnels when they wear out. One New York faction bitterly opposed a bridge, on the ground that it would mar the famous lower Manhattan skyline and injure Battery Park’s beauty. The other faction, including the mayor, Mr la Guardia, contended that a tunnel would be too costly.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19390719.2.98

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 23322, 19 July 1939, Page 9

Word Count
138

BRIDGE OR TUNNEL? Evening Star, Issue 23322, 19 July 1939, Page 9

BRIDGE OR TUNNEL? Evening Star, Issue 23322, 19 July 1939, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert