Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ONE-SIDED TRADE

AMERICA AND AUSTRALIA A DIFFICULT PROBLEM Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright WASHINGTON, June 30. (Received July 1, at 12.20 p.ra.) With conferences scheduled for Mr Lyons with President Roosevelt and Mr Cordell Hull and the Assistant Secretary of State (Mr F. Sayre) during his 24 hours’ stay in Washington next week, a careful canvass of the situation shows that the American authorities are not very hopeful of concrete results from the Prime Minister’s visit. It is fairly well understood that Mr Lyons will serve a very polite and friendly, but none the less firm, warning that unless something can be done to increase American consumption of Australian products, redressing the trade balance a little more equitably with the dominion, something will have to be done by Australia to curtail purchases here and increase purchases in European and Asiatic countries by means of special bilateral trade agreements. As it concerns the possibility of an Australia n-American reciprocal trade treaty the position is considered especially difficult. The United States would demand “ unconditional and most favoured nation ” . treatment, which is considered impossible within the framework of the Ottawa Agreements. . ,

It is pointed out that the United States in 1932 was ready to negotiate a general commercial treaty with Australia, which besides providing a trade understanding would have eased the difficulties of Australian businessmen, who at the present time must operate under six months’ visitors’ visas while in the United States.

It is contended that the Commonwealth Government “ shied off ” fi'om the negotiations and the matter fell through. Relative to providing some additional markets for Australian primary goods, State department officials are ready to acknowledge the need and justice of such a request, but frankly admit that, there is little prospect of materially increasing the consumption of Australian commodities in the near future, save in the event of some great shortage, such as the present meat scarcity, when the President might be called upon to issue an executive order temporarily lifting the duty on certain commodities, such as he did with hay and feed a year ago. The existing shortage of butter has helped Australia little, however, for, whereas 22,000,0001 b have been imported during the past three months New Zealand provided 2,000,0001 b, but Australia only 250,0001 b. This was due to the export bounty .which automatically put a compensating tariff increase on Australian butter when brought to the United States.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19350701.2.135

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 22069, 1 July 1935, Page 12

Word Count
398

ONE-SIDED TRADE Evening Star, Issue 22069, 1 July 1935, Page 12

ONE-SIDED TRADE Evening Star, Issue 22069, 1 July 1935, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert