Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FOOTWEAR FASHIONS

SHOE VERSUS BOOT CHANGES IN THIRTY YEARS Everyone knows that shoes are much more fashionable than boots, but it Is probably only those within the trade who realise how complete the change in custom has become. One still speaks of “ bootmakers ” and “ boot shops, but that is really a misnomer carried oyer from the days when boots were the almost universal wear both for men and women. The manager of a large city warehouse said that he sells 100 pairs of men’s shoes for every one of boots. About 30 years ago the movement among women for shoes in preference to boots first began to make itself felt. Prior to that long, soft uppers, with innumerable buttons, had to -be adjusted by the strenuous use of a buttonhook, and shoes were restricted to use only for social evening wear. Even at the close of the war many women’s hoots were being sold, but in 1919 their end came quite suddenly. The fashion has not returned. One might search the city streets for weeks now without seeing a pair of women’s boots. Men followed the women’s lead in footwear much later. About 15 years ago their trend toward shoes began to be marked, and the rout of the oldfasliioned men’s boot, as far as city wear is concerned, has been complete. Even boys, and country lads, as well as town boys, are rarely to be seen in anything except shoes. Of course, workmen’s strong boots are still used in large quantities by outdoor labourers, and players of football and hockey have yet to bo converted to the use of the neat shoe in their games, while the military boot still has its uses, but for normal city wear inquiries for hoots are confined almost entirely to elderly men who are loth to abandon a lifetime’s custom, and to some with weak ankles, who are convinced that the boot gives them some degree of support. What is the reason for so sweeping a change? The shoe has triumphed because it is much more hygienic, especially in a warm _ climate, where it is healthy and desirable to have free passage of air about the foot. The lightness of shoes is also in their favour. Certainly price does not enter into it, for in this shoes cannot claim any advantage over their rivals. One factor that undoubtedly has had an important bearing on the change has been the vast improvement in streets and footpaths. Shoes had little chance so long as wading through mud was a daily necessity. _ Yet, when all explanations are considered, probably the most complete one is summed up in the one _ word “ fashion.” The change of fashion in this case has been world-wide. _ Very soon even those who still maintain that boots are much more comfortable and healthy will have to submit to adopting shoes, for the simple reason that there will bo nothing’else for them to wear.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19350627.2.79

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 22066, 27 June 1935, Page 9

Word Count
490

FOOTWEAR FASHIONS Evening Star, Issue 22066, 27 June 1935, Page 9

FOOTWEAR FASHIONS Evening Star, Issue 22066, 27 June 1935, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert