Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE

SELF HELP STORE ROBBERY [Per United Press Association.] CHRISTCHUIiCH, September 19. Fingerprints found on a piece of leadlight figured largely in the police case against Albert William Gauntlett (25), a labourer, charged to-day that on or about August 23 he broke and entered the Self-help Store at Linwood and committed theft. He pleaded not guilty, and was committed to the Supremo Court for trial, bail being refused. Meantime an officer of . the criminal registration branch, Wellington, gave evidence that the fingerprints on the glass were identical with those of the accused forwarded to him from Paparua. The police stated that the accused, when informed that the fingerprints corresponded, declared that it was a mistake; that ho had never been near the Linwood store.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19330919.2.123

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 21520, 19 September 1933, Page 12

Word Count
125

FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE Evening Star, Issue 21520, 19 September 1933, Page 12

FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE Evening Star, Issue 21520, 19 September 1933, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert