STRANGE LAWSUIT
"REVOLUTION” IN FRENCH HOMES? PARIS, March 31. A legal decision which is regarded as epoch-making has been delivered by the First Chamber of the Paris Court of Appeal. It recognises the right of a husband to bequeath part of his estate to his mistress. Two women—both grey-haired to-day—have been engaged in a legal battle over this question for fifteen years. Tho man in the case was killed in action in 1917. Ho was a wealthy Paris business man, who before the war had established two homes—one legal, the other frankly “ extra-conjugal.” _ After his death it was found that his will left part of his fortune to his mistress. Tho wife, however, refused to allow her rival to take possession of the property allocated to her. Before the court she invoked the famous principle of French law that no contract contrary to public order or sound morals is binding. Counsel for the unofficial wife argued, however, that a husband does not always desert his homo for reasons that are essentially immoral. He suggested that in the present case the man sought outside his homo the tranquillity which he failed to find at the side of his wife, After much hesitation the Civil Tribunal accepted this argument. Now the Appeal Court, also after much hesitation, has followed suit.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19320413.2.8
Bibliographic details
Evening Star, Issue 21076, 13 April 1932, Page 1
Word Count
218STRANGE LAWSUIT Evening Star, Issue 21076, 13 April 1932, Page 1
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.