MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Evening Star, Issue 20864, 6 August 1931, Page 9

MAGISTRATE'S COURT

THURSDAY, AUGUST 6. (Before Mr J. R. Bartholomew, S.M.) Judgment by default for plaintiff (with costs) was given in tho following oases;—Dunedin Brewery v. F. Ehrhorn, £2 11s, goods supplied; Todd Motor Company v. Thomas Andrew Johnston (Timarn), £4O, promissory notes due; H. W. Allen and Co. v. Elizabeth Mi. Healy, £5 3s, goods supplied; Sargood, Son. and Eweii v. G. M. Beaufort (Roxburgh), £5 7s 6d, goods supplied; M. A. Bolton v. J. Smith, £8 17s 6d, rent duo; Electrical Sales Agency v. Mosgiel Motors and Engineering Company (Mosgiel), £9 14s 3d, goods supplied; T. and P. Milk Supply Company v M. IT. MacPhorson (New Plymouth), £lO 5s 4d, goods supplied; John Mill and Co. v. A. G. Seidlin, £5 17s, goods supplied; B. Edwards v. Kathleen Buchanan, £lO 16s lOd, goods supplied; A. Boag v. G. Forsyth, £5 38s 4d, goods supplied and work done; English Motors v. Eric L. Nye, £5, goods supplied; M. J. Smith and C. V. Smith v. Gilbert William Dodds, £l9, rent due; Phoenix Company v. W. T. Mathicson and Co. (Gore), £9 0s 9d, goods supplied. JUDGMENT SUMMONS. Tlio Public Trustee proceeded against James William Popo on a claim for £37 3s (id. but alter the defendant had explained liis position no order was made. J CDEMENT FOR DEFENDANT. Reserved judgment was given in tlio ease in which Battersby and Co. (Mr 0. .Stevens) proceeded against John Frederick Roseubrock (Mr R. M. King) on a claim for £SO. alleging that defendant bad given plaintiff an 10U for that amount. After reviewing the facts of tho case : judgment was given for the defendant, with costs (£G 4s).