Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LOVE THAT LASTS

PATHETIC SCENE IN COURT FATHER SUES SON FOR MAINTENANCE WON'T SEE WIFE CROSS-EXAMINED [E*b United Press Association.) WELLINGTON, May 6. A case commenced in the Magistrate’s Court on Wednesday before Mr J. H. Salmon, S.M., in which John Snell (aged_ 72) sued his son, Joseph Snell, who is in charge of the mortgage department of the Public Trust Office, and is getting a salary of £565 a year, for maintenance. It took a sensational turn to-day. Defendant gave evidence, stating that his father was kindly treated by the family. He (defendant) refused to give the requested £1 a week maintenance, as he thought his father living alone was a reflection on the family. Defendant said he was willing that his father should go to a home (public or private). He would contribute to his support. Ho denied that his father had expended any money on him (directly or indirectly) since he (defendant) was thirteen years old. Under cross-examinatipn, defendant admitted that he had never given his father a shilling in his life, and defendant was now forty-four. Plaintiff’s wife, Lenora Snell, aged 74, was next called. She said that, but for the differences usual in matrimony, she had had happy times with her husband, and that if he came back homo he would be treated kindly. Plaintiff’s counsel rose to crossexamine. Plaintiff pleaded with him not to ask her any questions, saying bo would ratlier lose the case than that she should have to undergo the further ordeal of giving evidence against him. Suddenly ho rose to his feet, and rushed towards his son with clenched fist and tears streaming down his face, asking the son how dare he bring his (plaintiff’s) wife to court, the woman ho loved best in the world.

Both counsel laid restraining hands ou the old man, and the wife had to be assisted from the court almost in a’ state of collapse. Tho magistrate intervened. Ho said the case had gone far enough—too far, in fact—and he asked counsel to see him in his room and talk tho matter over. Decision will ho given to-day.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19270507.2.52

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 19550, 7 May 1927, Page 9

Word Count
354

LOVE THAT LASTS Evening Star, Issue 19550, 7 May 1927, Page 9

LOVE THAT LASTS Evening Star, Issue 19550, 7 May 1927, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert