Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INTERNATIONAL LABOR

THE GENEVA MEETING INSPECTION OF MIGRANTS. A SHARP DISCUSSION. Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright GENEVA, June 4. In an addendiun to the procesvorbal of the committee on emigration, which has been published in its final form, there appears a sharp passage between the Italian delegate, Mr Beasley (Australia), and the chairman. It appears that the Italian delegate stated that Italy could not adhere to tho convention, which would involve abandoning her rights to the inspection of immigrants in favor of another system of inspection. Ho proposed an additional form of words calculated to obviate the necessity of making the inspection compulsory, but simplifying the present methods. Mr Beasley is reported to have sard that the conference bad to_ face the Italian amendment in a candid manner, as the delegation was either putting it forward to wreck the whole scheme or else had a motive known only to_ its own Government. Whatever the idea was behind the measures the workers must view the proposal with grave suspicion, because of the forms of organisation prevailing in that cornice Chairman, intervening, said that each member of the Labor organisation, inside its own frontiers, set up what forms of organisation it considered suitable, and be must protest strongly against Mr Beasley’s insinuations. His remarks were much to be regretted. . . , , , ~ Professor Guiannmi thanked the chairman for his protest, and said that he would have carried the matter further, but for tho effective intervention of the chairman. The conference considered the objections lodged against the Fascist workers’ delegate and the Indian employers’ representative, who after a vote, wore unanimously admitted as accredited. Late to-day tho emigration convention was discussed, ana many amendments were submitted. It is very doubtful whether the conference will accept the final drafts as a convention or make recommendations only. The conference rejected the eighth clause of the convention, dealing with the simplification of the inspection of emigrants.—A. and N.Z, Cable.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19260605.2.39

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 19268, 5 June 1926, Page 4

Word Count
318

INTERNATIONAL LABOR Evening Star, Issue 19268, 5 June 1926, Page 4

INTERNATIONAL LABOR Evening Star, Issue 19268, 5 June 1926, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert