DIVORCE DEFENCE COSTS
HUSBAND HAS TO PAY. [Fr.R United Preps Association.] CHPJSTCHUBCH, October 9. Judgment for the plaintiffs was given by Mr Widdowßcm, SAL, to-day in the case of Sargent, Slater, and Dak, solicitors, versus Andrew Boag, a claim for £llß 4s 6d, representing the costs incurred in successfully defending divorce proceedings brought by Hoag against his wife. The magistrate held that the agreement for separation was due to the wrongful act or conduct of the husband, and the wife had the necessary implied authority w pledge her husband's credit in defending Urn action
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19221009.2.74
Bibliographic details
Evening Star, Issue 18094, 9 October 1922, Page 6
Word Count
94DIVORCE DEFENCE COSTS Evening Star, Issue 18094, 9 October 1922, Page 6
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in