Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MARITAL RELATIONS

THE MENTAL HOSPITAL CASE. WELLINGTON, May 1. The Court of Appeal gave, judgment this morning in the case the King versus John Leonard, a case in which the_ husband was convicted under the provisions of tho Mental Defectives Act for having intercourse with his* wife, who was detained under tho provisions of the Act. Tho jury found Leonard “guilty, but with strong recommendation to mercy, as we believe the act was committed through ignorance, and also the laxity of the hospital authorities in .not warning prisoner.” Tho court, by a majority of three to one, affirmed the conviction on the ground that the words of the .Statute were plain, and the court could not hold that Parliament did not mean what it said. (Mr Justice Stringer dissented, and considered that the words “every person ” in the Act -should not he read to include tho husband.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19220501.2.70

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 17956, 1 May 1922, Page 6

Word Count
147

MARITAL RELATIONS Evening Star, Issue 17956, 1 May 1922, Page 6

MARITAL RELATIONS Evening Star, Issue 17956, 1 May 1922, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert