ARBITRATION COURT
THE WORKERS’ REPRESENTATIVE. MR M'CULLOUGH’S RENOMINATION. * [Special to the ‘Star.’] CHRISTCHURCH, September 14. At' a largely-attended meeting of the No. 1 Branch of the Amalgamated Society of Engineers it was decided to nominate Mr M'Cullough as workers’ representative on the Court of Arbitration. ,A motion was unanimously ' agreed to condemning the action of the court in breaking the agreement of t]\e stabilisation of wages by reducing the wages of shearers, and supporting Mr M'Cullough in the action taken by him in resigning from the, court as a protest against the agreement being broken.
According to come trade union secretaries the interpretation given by the At-torney-General in respect of the appointment of a workers’ representative (nominated) and a deputy workers’ representative acting (nominated) dors not appear to fit in with tho procedure adopted in the past when unions registered underlie Industrial Conciliation ami ■Arbitration Act have been requested to send in nominations for both positions. Mr C. Renn, who is secretary of several unions, informed a reporter that as he read the AttorneyGeneral's interpretation he took it that the Attorney-General considered that the unions only nominated a person for tho position of workers’ representative (one of the nominated members of the court), and that the deputy (the acting nominated member) was appointed by the GovernorGeneral from those persons who had been nominated for the position of workers’ representative. Tn the past the union had been asked to nominate persons to fill tho {wo positions—that of workers' representative, and that of doruty workers’ representative. Tho interpretation of the At-torney-General appealed tn he that they were only railed upon to nominate for ouo' position, and that the Governor-General fettled who was to he tho workers’ representative and who is to he the deputy. It had been the custom for candidates for both positions to circularise the unions in support of their candidature, and Mr Renn could recall un in sta uce whore, one candidate had stood simultaneously for both positions.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19210914.2.19
Bibliographic details
Evening Star, Issue 17766, 14 September 1921, Page 3
Word Count
329ARBITRATION COURT Evening Star, Issue 17766, 14 September 1921, Page 3
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.