WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE

Evening Star, Issue 17544, 27 December 1920, Page 7

WEIGHED IN THE BALANCE

DAVID LLOYD GEORGE. AN OVERSHADOWING PERSONALITY. PRE-EMtNENQB WITHOUT ..EMINENCE. An amazingly frank and not wholly complimentary appraisal of the British Prime Minister is contained in the ‘Daily News’ of October 27, 'published by arrangement with Messrs Mills and Boon from ‘The Mirrors of Downing Street ’ by “A Gentleman With a Duster.” If you think about it, he begins, no one since Napoleon has appeared on the earth who attracts so universal an interest as Mr Lloyd George. This is a rather startling thought. It is significant, I think, how completely a politician should overshadow all the great soldiers and sailors charged with their nation’s very life in the severest and infinitely the most critical military straggle of man’s history. . A democratic age, lacking in color, and antipathetic to romance, somewhat obscures for us the pictorial achievement of this remarkable figure. He lacks only a crown, a robe, and a gilded chair easily to outshine in visible picuresqueness the great Emperor. His achievement, when ,we consider what hung upon it, is greater than Napoleon’s, the narrative of his origin more romantic, his character more complex. And yet who does not feel the greatness of Napoleon? And who does not suspect the shallowness of Mr Lloyd George? » History, it is certain, will unmask his pretensions to grandeur with a rough, perhaps with an angry, hand; hut all the more because of this unmasking posterity will continue to crowd about the exposed hero, asking, and perhaps for centuries continuing to ask, questions concerning his place in the history of the world. “How came it, man of straw, that .in Armageddon there was none greater than you?” The coldest-blooded amongst us—Mr Massingham, of ‘The Nation,’ for example —must confess that it was a moment rich in the emotion which bestows immortality on incident when this son of a village schoolmaster, who grew up in a shoemaker’s shop, and whose boyish games were played in the street of a Welsh hamlet remote from all the refinements of

civilisation and all the clangors of industrialism, announced to a breathless Europe without any pomposity of phrase and with but a brief and contemptuous gesture of dismissal the passing away from the world’s stage of the Hapshurgs and Hohenzollerus —those ancient, long glorious, and most puissant houses whose history for an son was the history of Europe. Such topsy-turvydom, such historical anarchy, tilts the figure of Mr Lloyd George into a salience so conspicuous that for a_ moment one is -tempted to confuse prominence with eminence, and to mistake the slagheap of upheaval for the peaks of Olympus. But how is it that this politician has attained even to such super-prominence? Another incident -of which the public knows nothing helps, one, I think, io answer this question. Early in the struggle to get munitions for our soldiers a meeting of all the principal manufacturers of armaments was held in Whitehall with the object of persuading them to pool their trade secrets. For a long time this meeting was nothing more than a succession of blunt speeches on the part of provincial manufacturers, showing with an unanswerable commercial logic that the suggestion of reevaling these secrets on which their fortunes depended was beyond the bounds of reason. All the interjected arguments of the and official gentlemen representing the Government were easily proved by these" hard-headed manufacturers, responsible to their work people and shareholders for the prosperity of their competing undertakings,, to be impracticable, if not preposterous. SECRET OF HIS POWER; , At a moment when the proposal ,of the Government seemed lost, Mr Lloyd George leant forward in his chair, very pale, very quiet, and very earnest. “ Gentlemen,” he said in a voice which

produced an extraordinary hush, “have you forgotten that your sons, at this very moment, are being killed—killed in hundreds and thousands? They .are being killed by German guns for want of- British guns. Your sons, your brothers—boys at the dawn of manhood! They are being wiped out of life in thousands! Gentlemen, give me guns. Don't think of your trade secrets. Think of your children. Help them! Give me those guns.” This was no stage acting. His voice broke, his eyes filled with tears, and his hand, holding a piece of notepaper before him, shook like a leaf. There was not a man who heard him whose heart was not touched and whoso humanity was not quickened. The trade secrets were pooled. The supply of munitions was hastened. This is the secret of his power. .No man of our period, when he is profoundly moved, and when he permits his genuine emotion to carry him away, can utter an appeal to conscience with anything like so compelling a simplicity. His failure lies in & growing tendency to discard an instinctive emotionalism for a calculated astuteness which too often attempts to hide its cunning under the garb of honest senti ment. His intuitions are unrivalled; his reasoning powers inconsiderable. ■ When Mr Lloyd George first came to London he shared not only a room in Gray’s Inn, but the one bed that garret contained, with a fellow-countryman. They were both inconveniently poor, but Mr Lloyd George the poorer in this, that as a member of Parliament his expenses were greater. The fellow-lodger, who afterwards became private secretary to one of Mr Lloyd George’s rivals, has told me that uo public speech of Mr Lloyd George ever equalled in pathos and power the speeches which the young member of Parliament would often make in tbose hungry days, seated on the edge of the bed, or pacing to and fro in the room, speeches lit by one passion and directed to one great object, lit by the passion of justice, directed to the liberation of all peoples oppressed by every form of tyranny. This spirit of the intuitional reformer, who feels cruelty and wrong like a pain in hia own • blood, is still present in Mr Lloyd George, but it is no longer the central passion of his life. It is, rather, an aside ; as it were a memory that revives only in leisure hours. Oh several occasions he has spoken to me of the sorrows and sufferings of humanity with an unmistakable sympathy. " I remember m particular one occasion on which he told me the story of his boyhood; it was a moving narrative, for never once did he refer to his own personal deprivations, never once express regret for his own loss of powerful encouragements in the important years of boyhood. The story was the story of his widowed mother and of her heroic struggle, keeping house for her shoemaking brother-in-law on the little money earned by the old bachelor’s village cobbling, to save sixpence a week—sixpence to be gratefully returned to him on Saturday night. ‘‘That is the life of the poor!” he .exclaimed earnestly. Then he added with bitterndss : “ And when I try to give them five shillings a week in their old age I am called the ‘Cad of the Cabinet’,!” HIS AMAZING INTUITIONS. _ His intuitions are amazing. He astonished great soldiers in the war by his premonstrations. Lord Milner, a cool critic, would sit by the sofa of the dying Dr Jameson telling how Mr Lloyd George was right and again when all the soldiers were/wrong. Lord Ehondda, who disliked Sira greatly, and rather despised him, told me how often Mr Lloyd George put heart into a Cabinet that was really trembling on the edge of despair. It seems true that he never once doubted ultimate victory. and, what is much more remarkable, ' never once failed to read the German mind. I think that the doom that has fallen upon him comes in some measure from the amusement he takes in his mental quickness, and the reliance he is sometimes apt to place upon it. A quick mind may easily be a disorderly mind. Moreover, Quickness is not one of the great qualities.

It is indeed seldom a partner with virtue. Morality on the whole to get along better without it. According to Landor, it is the talent most open to suspicion Quickness is among the least of the mind’s properties, and belongs to her in almost her lowest state; nay, it doth not abandon her when she is driven from her home, when she is wandering and insane. The mad often retain it; the liar has it; the cheat has it; we find it on the racecourse and at the card table; education does not give it, and reflection takes away from it.” When we consider what Mr Lloyd George might have done with the fortunes of humanity wo are able to see how great is his distance from the heights of moral grandeur. " . THE CHANGED NOTE. _He entered the* war with genuine passion. He swept thousands of hesitating minds info those .dreadful furnaces by the force of that passion. From the first no man in tin world sounded so ringing a trumpet note of moral indignation and moral aspiration. Examine his* earlier speeches', and in all of them you will find that his passion to destroy Prussian militarism was his passion to recreate civilisation on the foundations of morality and religion. He was Peace with a sword. Germany had not so much attempted io drag mankind back to barbarism as opened a gate through which mankind might march to the promised land. Lord Morley was almost breaking his heart with despair, and to this day regards Great Britain’s entrance into the war as a mistake. Sir Edward Grey was agonising to avert war. But Mr Lloyd George was among the first to see this war as the opportunity for a nobler civilisation. Destroy German militarism, shatter the Prussian tradition, sweep away, dynastic autocracies, and what a_ world would result for laboring humanity ! This was in 1914. But soon after the great struggle had begun the note changed. Hatred of Germany and fear for our Allies’ steadfastness occupied the foremost place in his mind. Victory was the objective, and his definition of victory was borrowed from the prize-ring. A better world had to wait. He became more and more reckless. There was a time when his indignation against Lord Kitchener was almost uncontrollable. For Mr Asquith he never entertained this violent feeling, but gradually lost patience with him, and decided that he must go only when procrastination appeared to jeopardise “ a knock-out blow.” And the end of it was the humiliation of the General Election in 1918. Where was the now world then? He was conscious only of Lord Northcliffe’s menace. Germany must pay and the Kaiser must be tried! There was no trumpet note' in those days, and there has been no trumpet note since. Imagine how Gladstone would have appealed to the conscience of his countrymen! Was there ever a greater opportunity in statesmanship? After a victory so tremendous was there any demand on the generosity of men’s souls which would not gladly have been granted? The long straggle between Capital and Labor, which tears every State in two, might have been ended; the heroism and self-sacrifice of the war might have been carried forward to the labors of reconstruction ; the wounds of Europe might have been healed by the- charities of God almost to the transfiguration of humanity.oi Germany must pay for the war?—and he knetv that by no possible means could Germany be made to' pay that vast account without the gravest danger of unemployment here and Bolshevism in Central Europe ■ The Kaiser must be tried !—and he knew that the Kaiser never would he tried ! Millennium dipped below the horizon, and the child’s riding-whip which Lord Northcliffe cracks when he is overtaken by a fit of Napoleonic indigestion assumed for the Prime Minister the proportions of the Damoclesian sword. He numbered himself among the Tououpinambos, those people who “ have no name for God and believe that they will get into Paradise by practising revenge and eating up their enemies.” A DECLINING POWER. The truth is that Mr Lloyd George has gradually lost in the world of political makeshift his original enthusiasm for righteousness. He is not a had man to the exclusion of goodness; but he is not a good man to the exclusion of badness. A woman w T ho knows him well once described him to me in these words: “He is clever and he is stupid; truthful and untruthful; pure and impure; good and wicked: wonderful and commonplace; in a word, he -is everything.” I am quite sure that he is perfectly sincere when be speaks of high aims and pure ambition; but I am equally sure that it is a relief to him to speak with amusement of trickery, cleverness, and the tolerances or the cyxiicisms of worldliness.

I in him an increasing lethargy both of mind and 1 body. His passion for the platform, which was once more to him than anything else, has almost gone. He enjoys well enough a fight when he is in it, hut to get him into a fight is not now so easy as his hangers-on would wish. The great man is tired, and, after all, evolution is not to he hurried. He loves his ramchair and he loves talking. Nothing pleases him for a longer spell than desnftory conversation with someone who is content to listen, or with someone who brings news of electoral chances. ’Of course, he is a tired man, but his fatigue is not only physical. ’ He mounted up in youth with wings like an eagle, in manhood he was able to run without weariness; but the first years of age find him pnable to walk without faintness—the sunreme test of character. If he had been able to keep the wings of his youth I think he mirrht have been almost the greatest man of British history. But luxury has invaded, and cynicism; and now a cigar in the depths of an easy chair, with Miss Megan Lloyd George on the arm, and' a clever politician on the opposite side of the hearth—this is pleasanter than any poetic vaporings about the xnillenium. THE VANISHED VISION. If only he amid rise from that destroying chair, if only he could fling off his vulcrar friendships, if only he could trust himself to his vision, if only he could believe one© again passionately in truth and justice and goodness and the soul of the British people! One wonders if the angels in Heaven will ever forgive his silence at a time when the famished children of Austria, many of them born with no bones, were dying like flies at the shrivelled breasts of thenstarving _ mothers. One wonders if the historian sixty years hence will be able to forgive him his rebuff to the' first genuine democratic movement in Germany during the war. His responsibility to God and to man is enormous beyond reckoning. Only the future can decide bis place here and hereafter. It is a mjral universe, and sooner or later the judgments of God manifest themselves to the eyes of men. One seems to see in him an illustrious example both of the value and perils of emotionalism. What power in the world is greater, controlled by moral principle? What power so dangerous, when moral earnestness ceases to inspire the feelings? Before the war he did much to quicken the social conscience throughout the world ; at the outbreak of war he was the very voice of moral indignation; and during the war he was the spirit of victory. For all this great is our debt to him. But he took upon his shoulders a responsibility which was nothing less than the future of civilisation, and here he trusted not to vision and conscience, but to compromise, makeshift, patches; 'and the future of civilisation is still dark indeed.

This I hope may be said on his behalf ■when he stands at the bar of history that the cause of his failure to serve the world as ho might have done, as Gladstone surely would have done, was due rather to a vulgarity of mind for which he was not wholly responsible than to any deliberate choice of a cynical partnership with the powers of darkness. ,