Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRICES AND PROFITS

CHARGE AGAINST A CHEMIST. [Pcr Uxited Press Association.3 HAWE.RA, Juuo 1. A charge, of having sold a pot of vaseline at a price? that is unreasonably high was brought against George C. Tait, chemist, before Mr T. A. B. Bailev, y.M. It is alleged that the offeiicv consisted in Rslling"* pot of Cheeseboroush vaseline at Is 3d. Defendant pleaded not •jnilty. Mr Billings, who prosecuted, contended tliat the price of an article must not only net produce a profit that was unreasonably high, but must not be calculated to produce more than a rea-son-j able rate of commercial profit. He asked j that tlis article be considered, alone, not j wifi what merchants or vendors were I making on other articles. Counsel contended that it was not a. question under the Act of what profit was made, in the business as a whole, but what the £eller I v.-iis making on that particular article. | That position was supported bv the purj poses of the Act, which rasulatpd and j controlled the Cost of Living- Each j particular line should he considered bv litsdf. The Magistrate stated that in trade j prices cannot be definitely fixed. Some articles were turned over rapidly, in other cases an article in a lino was not sold once indx months. Five per cent, miaht be a fair profit on a line turned over evenday and 20 per cent, mi.aht not be a big profit on other lines which were rarelv demanded. Mr Eii lings agreed that a uniform profit could not be fixed. Referring- to this case, ho said the wholesale cost of vaseline differed with various merchants apparently at the time of purchase. Soma purchased the line at 8d wholesale while others perhaps paid a little more He suggested that §7 per cent, was an unreasonably high profit. He could ehew other chemists .soiling the line at U, a grocer at Is, and another grocer at 10d. Charles Chappie, oheew factory manager at Whareroa, gave evidence that ho purchased a pot containing four ounces of vaseline at Tait's shop for Is 3d Later Ke found that he could have bought the same at a grocers for 10d and at another chemists for Is. H e .j lad foeix inquiring because he thought Tsii's price particularly high. .i Jlr „2 ich » r < l son.- chemist ia diaree of the Friendly Society's shop, said, he • charged Is for a similar pot. For tho past 6ix months tho cost had been 7* 2d to 8b a dozen in Wellington, He had to pay freight. He was satisfied with the profit made in sellin» at 1= ■ There was no recognised wav Sf fixhv'1 prices among business people. Cross-examined, witness said Ids dispensary claimed to be a Jioa-prtffit-niakiiM' concern. It was run for the benefit of , the United Friendly Society. Ho sold , to the general public, but did not cater for them primarily. He would not necessarily bs, satisfied if he was .in ■ business on his own account -with the - same profits as the society were satisfied with. _ln chemists' s£ops they did not split 3d. This was the universal practice. Before the war a four-ounce pot was sold at Auckland for Is and two*

ounce pots for 6d, Since then two-ounoe pots have risen nearby 2 per cent., while four-ounce pots had remained stationary. The two-ounce pot was now Sd. He knew that Cheeseborough vaseline before the war could bo bought at 5s 6d a dozen. It was then soiling at Is. Generally a chemist did not compete in the same lines with grocers. Witness gave evidence further of the comparative cost of running chemists' and graoeTs' businesses. A chemist's assistant, owing to his professional qualifications, needed higher pay than a grocer's assistant. He could not express an opinion whether or not other chemists were charging too much for- vaseline at Is 3d. If it was costing them 9a 6d per dozen Is 5d a pot would be- fair.. He could not say whether his society made a profit. The greatest profit was made in* dispensinc. Mr BiTiugs said there may be "too many chemists at Hawera to sell the lines required. It was not a justification I tor high prices if five were trvdng to make- a profit by handling what required only tinea men. 1 At this stage the court- adjourned.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19200602.2.48

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 17368, 2 June 1920, Page 7

Word Count
728

PRICES AND PROFITS Evening Star, Issue 17368, 2 June 1920, Page 7

PRICES AND PROFITS Evening Star, Issue 17368, 2 June 1920, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert