Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE COURTS-TO-DAY

MAGISTRATE’S COURT. 'Before H. V. . Widdowson. E“q.. S.Mri Judgment by dr fault, with costs, wa., given ° for plunitiif.i for amounts of accciints stated! in tho following cases: M‘Arthurs, Ltd., v. George Hunter Jells £5- Johnstone and Haslct-t v. James Richmond (Lawrence), £1 7s 6d : Nimmo and ; Blair, Ltd., v. John Egan (Arapito), 19s |6d; M‘Arthurs, Ltd., v. John Cadmon, £1 i 15a 8d ; Kiach and M’Lennun. Ltd, v. Albert Grigs'. £3 13s 7d ; sam© v. Joseph Grig", £65 3« 4d; D.IC., Ltd., v. Wdlliarh Feans (Arrowtown), £l2 10s; same v. William A. Prim/. Invercargill), £23_4s 1 7d; I’iach and M'Lennan, Ltd, v. \\il- ! linm Grigg. £8 12, sd; Charles Harold Austin v. Joseph Potter (Port Chalmers), costs only \o>) ; Johnstone and Ilasictt v. Patrick Keogh. £1 Is od. Disputed Account. —In the previouslyhoard case A. E. Ushenvood and Co, (Mr Moore) v. Joseph Clarke and Co. (Christchurch (Mr C. G. White), claim far £54 2-s sd, balance due on account for salt delivered. jud"in«nt was given for plaintiffs for £54 18s lOd, with costs (£1 10s).—IDs Worship thanked both counsel for the assistance giver, him in unravelling thi® intricate and complicated ease. CITY POLICE COURT. fßoforo H. Y. Widdowson, Esq., S.M.) Three first offenders for drunkenness were lined 10s or' 24 hours’ imprisonment, 20s or 48 hours, and 12s or 48 hours respectively. Oliver Sidal, who did not appear, was fined 20s, or in the alternative 48 hours’ imprisonment. Hugh Goodlet pleaded guilty _to a, charge of drunkenness and procuring liquor during the currency of a prohibition order.— Senior-sergeant Murray said that the accused was admitted to probation at the .Supreme Court in April, one of the conditions being that he took out a prohibition order against himself.—On the first charge he was fined 20s or 48 hours’ imprisonment, and on the second charged 20s or seven days’ imprisonment.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19190701.2.76

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 17084, 1 July 1919, Page 6

Word Count
311

THE COURTS-TO-DAY Evening Star, Issue 17084, 1 July 1919, Page 6

THE COURTS-TO-DAY Evening Star, Issue 17084, 1 July 1919, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert