Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE OOURTS-YESTERDAY.

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. (Before H. Y. Widdowson, Esq., S.M.) Judgment was given for the plaintiffs by default with costs in the following cases:—Andrew Lees (Mr Scantlebury) v. Richatrd T.- M'Cormack (St. Leonards), claim £1 15s, for work done (judgment for 17s and costs); M. Morton and Son (Mr Moore) v. Alexander Clydesdalo (Roslyn), claim £7 13s sd, on a promissory note (judgment for £6 13s od and costs); Hordem and White (Mr Scantlebury) v - Thomas Hussey, claim 9s, for work done; Alfred \\. Brown (Mr Moore) v. Thomas M'Guire (Wanganui), claim £ll 10s, on a promissory note; Scoullar and Chisholm (Mr Duncan) r. Thomas Latta (Owaka), claim £36 4s 3d, for articles supplied (judgment for 15s and costs); Gaudin and Marr (Mr Moore) v. George Jarvie (Kaitangata), claim 10s, for goods supplied ; same v. Patrick O'Hara. (Greymouth), claim 14s 7d, for goods supplied ; Hondai-Lanka Tea Company (Mr Moore) v. Robert Johnston (Glenavy), claim £2, for tea supplied ; Tilbury Forwarding Company v. James Mitchell (Oamaru), claim £" 17s 2d, for cash collected, Keith Ramsay and Co. (Mr Ramsav) v. Andrew Bros. (Christchurch), claim £2 7s 6d, for goods supplied ; John Hislop (Mr Hawkins) v. James Young, claim 19s 6d, for jewelI lerv supplied. J. ind J. Arthur (Mr Irwin) v. Frederick Bell CGorc). —Claim £l, on a judgment summons. There was no appearance of the defendant, who was ordered to pay the amount due (with costs), in default 48 hours' imprisonment. Joseph Nathan and Co. v. M'Phc-r----son, Kemp, and Co. —Claim £33 Is, for six cases of ground almonds sold to the defendants. Mr Lemon appeared for the plaintiffs, and asked for an adjournment This way objected to by ■'Mr W. C. MacGregor (who represented 'the defendants), and after argument the case was eventually adjourned until the 29th inst., the question of the costs of the adjournment being reserved. CITY POLICE COURT. (Before H. Y. Widdowson, Esq., S.M.) ■Drunkenness.—David Adamson was fined 22s or three days' imprisonment. Two first offenders were each fined 5s or 24 hours, and another 10s or 24 hours. Vagrancy.—Sarah Saywell was charged with drunkenness and with bring a ■ rogue and vagabond, in that ehe had insufficient lawful means of support. She pleaded guilty to both charges.— The Sub-inspector said that accused was only about eis weeks out of the Salvation Army Home, after being there for 12 months. A Chinaman was at present giving her shelter.—Accused said that, she would return to the Army Home, and His Worship sent her back theie for another period of 12 month*.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19110802.2.85

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 14634, 2 August 1911, Page 9

Word Count
421

THE OOURTS-YESTERDAY. Evening Star, Issue 14634, 2 August 1911, Page 9

THE OOURTS-YESTERDAY. Evening Star, Issue 14634, 2 August 1911, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert