Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A CRIMINAL APPEAL

[Pee United Press Association.]

WELLINGTON, October 12. • Iho Appeal Court to-day are hearing Hex v. Brown and M'Cann. The case turns on a provision in the Crimes Act which enacts that if prisoners choose not to give evidence on their own behalf no adverse comment shall be allowed thereon. In this case respondents were charged with robbery, and did not give evidence, and were convicted aftei the Judge had commented on the fact that they did not go into the box tc contradict the prosecutor. The question for the Court was whether the provision in the Act binds the Judge or only the Crown Prosecutor. If the former, it was admitted that the conviction must bo quashed. Mr Myers appears for thi Crown,\ and Mr Webb for the prisoners.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19091012.2.65

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 14187, 12 October 1909, Page 6

Word Count
132

A CRIMINAL APPEAL Evening Star, Issue 14187, 12 October 1909, Page 6

A CRIMINAL APPEAL Evening Star, Issue 14187, 12 October 1909, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert