Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POULTRY FARMING.

TO THE EDITOR. Sib,—When I read Mr Shrimpton's letter I was disposed to think that soma thanks were due to him for kindly giving interesting information, and the only feeling I had was one regret that he had not furnished more details. My feelings when I read "J.J.G.'s" letter this evening were very different. Now ,what can he mean? Does he say poultrv farming is not profitable, or what? If a farmer buys a farm, does he not give his time and labor to it? Does he expect tho profit of a year to pay the purchase or the cost of the implements required? Surely not; he only expects a fair interest for his invested capital and a reward for his time.

_ Mr Shnmpton fairly points out that there is a good return for capital, but it is a pity he did not go further and give au idea what capital it took to earn the profit of £44 14s 7d for the year. It strikes me this profit would pay a fair interest on the purchase of sufficient land to stock 105 fowls on, and also on other incidental expenditure. Again, his profit of £44 14s 7d should be more, as by his own showing his stock is greater by some 50 birds, at, say, 3s eachequal to £7 10s extra profit. Again, the manure of poultry has a value. Some say that the sum derived from its sale feeds the birds, and 3s 6d per bird is a general estimate for the year's yield of manure. Mr Shrimpton is very weak m his account when showin" an accurate profit of £44 14s 7d, so concise and to the odd penny. Ho shows the most costly expenditure—viz., food—in the same account as costing "about £25." Surely he cannot show profits if he does not keep an account of expenditure ?

Nevertheless, his letter is in many waj s interesting. His ascertained average of"'eggs laid per hen is 145. The birds are principally Leghorn and Minorca, and these I iris are always considered good for 200 eggs per yc-er' But that is in theory. If he did n'>t cat ai,v himself, theory is overthrown by actual figure and fact. I wish someone would uivc. u.< his views, and for once and all solve the question Does poultry farming pay on a large scale, and what capital will suffice? Tho importance of the subject to the community generally, the interest taken therein, and the present many conflicting opinions existing, will, I trust, be some excuso for my trespassing.—l am, etc., Orpington. August 9.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19000813.2.30.1

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 11318, 13 August 1900, Page 3

Word Count
433

POULTRY FARMING. Evening Star, Issue 11318, 13 August 1900, Page 3

POULTRY FARMING. Evening Star, Issue 11318, 13 August 1900, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert