Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NO SETTLEMENT

RAILWAY OFFICERS

' HIGHER SALARY CLAIMS ■°-f' -1,-,-* AUCKLAND, This .Day. . A possibility that the Railway' Officers Institute and the Railways Department might reach an amicable , [agreement on the question of better : .salaries and conditions, has . not , materialised. At the conclusion of , . [two-day negotiations in Wellington Hast week the national executive of the - institute declined certain proposals put , > l*?™? 1? by the Department and de- - 'fCided to place its case before the .•Hallway Wages Tribunal. . The Department's offers included an -^crease in salaries for all members of the first division,.as v/ell as amend- • .ments to boarding allowances for retlievmg personnel to meet the increased cost of living. -The Department also proposed a new schedule of hours for overtime work. " Although they- considered the offers in respect to salaries were fairly .reasonable, members of the railway ;officers\ executive expressed dissatis- :' ?i acll on Wlth the Proposed alterations ■.to the system of, overtime, and largely on this account it was decided to ' ' €° «>-tne tribunal: The case will be £££ rd + £ OW + ai£ s th, e end of this month .„after the tribunal has dealt with that of the Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants;. '-' -The question of members of the Railway .Officers' Institute who had volunteered to go into essential indus- . j tries while serving with the- Third Division i n the Pacific being qom- -.- (Pelled to work m the second division jof .the railway service also was ,' '• i takf, n., u P last week with the Minister - ,of Railways. Mr. Semple. ■ The Minis- • iter agreed that this anomaly did not - ; . jnake for the maximum efficiency of -™c service, but he said it was a' Cabinet decision and nothing could ibe done until it was rescinded - ,

SECOND DIVISION DISPUTE. ' A + ,,me? ting, of the Auckland , branch of the Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, which was held in the 5£ c vil Ml a}- Newmarket yesterday, .-.--decided that any stop-work meeting ,of members of the branch would be . held over until the decision of the .tribunal set up to'deal with the wages ..dispute was'- made known. Ther^ were <twcior; three dissentients who wanted . i? have a', stop-work meeting today •The tribunal will start its sitting in .Wellington on October 9.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19441002.2.79

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXXVIII, Issue 80, 2 October 1944, Page 6

Word Count
366

NO SETTLEMENT Evening Post, Volume CXXXVIII, Issue 80, 2 October 1944, Page 6

NO SETTLEMENT Evening Post, Volume CXXXVIII, Issue 80, 2 October 1944, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert