Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT RECALLED

MR. LANGSTONE'S POST

REPORT CONTRADICTED

P.A. „ • TAIHAPE, This Day. The Hon. F.'^Langstone, Labour can-* didate for Waimarino and late New Zealand High Commissioner to Canada, has sent the following telegram to Mr. R. Malcolm, Independent candidate for Wellington North: "If report appearing Friday's 'Evening Post' attributed to you concerning my being recalled from Canada is correct I will issue writ for damages for publication of such a malicious, false,' and completely untrue statement. I tendered my resignation- from the High Commissionership of Canada and was not recalled. I shall call the Prime Minister to testify that your remarks are untrue in every- particular."

The contents of the above telegram were referred to Mr. Malcolm this afternoon. At the time he had not received the telegram from Mr. Langstone. He stated, however, that the word "recalled," if he used it (which he did not recollect) was a mistake, as he was aware that Mr. Langstone resigned. He intended no personal reflection upon Mr. Langstone and wished to assure him that he made no such suggestion. His remarks were part of his discussion of the system of New Zealand representation abroad, when he explained that, in his view, such appointments should be held by business men trained in a special diplomatic course to act as commercial and trade representatives, and should not be filled from the political field.

The statement was printed by "The Post" without perception of the error in the use of the word "recall." The fact that Mr. Langstone resigned was published in "The Post" at the time and has been frequently repeated in reports of debates on the question. We regret, nevertheless, that publicity should have been given to any statement conveying a different impression.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19430921.2.65

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXXVI, Issue 71, 21 September 1943, Page 6

Word Count
289

NOT RECALLED Evening Post, Volume CXXXVI, Issue 71, 21 September 1943, Page 6

NOT RECALLED Evening Post, Volume CXXXVI, Issue 71, 21 September 1943, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert