Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BEVERIDGE PLAN

CRITICISM AND REPLY

(By Telegraph— Preis Anoclttlon—C«»yrl|ht) (Special Correspondent.) LONDON; January 20. Parliament will be a great, centre of attraction when the Beveridge plan is debated. Meanwhile, the mam arguments of its opponents have been that social security will demoralise the people and prevent their being enterprising and adventurous. Sir William Beveridge, in a speech at Plymouth, declared that these critics were defeatists, and said: "Adventure comes from those who are fed well enough to feel ambition^ not from half-starved people." He asked: "How can one demoralise people by spending money on keeping them well or by making them fit for work by rehabilitation, or by giving them the assurance that at the end of their lives they will have just enough money to live on without being a burden on their children?" Sir Robert Barclay, chairman of the I District Bank, is so far the only banker who supports the Beveridge plan. He says that the plan, would not really prove as heavy as might appear on the surface, since to a large extent the nation is already carrying the burden through the present social services. He suggests that it is a case of rationalising the financial burden already existing. The "Manchester Guardian" observed recently that "a tide of criticism, both reasoned and superstitious, is again rising against the banks." It is not surprising therefore, that at annual meetings of the banks the chairmen have been delivering broadsides against this criticism. The Hon. Rupert Beckett, of the Westminster Bank, states that nationalisation of the banks would make the service .neither cheaper nor more efficient, but would destroy its flexibility and thus damage trade. He declares that banking is not a monopoly, but a highly competitive business. Dealing with the resentment shown against the banks by exalted clerics, he suggests that their advocacy of nationalisation springs "from political prejudice, incapable of coherent explanation." „

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19430122.2.96

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXXV, Issue 18, 22 January 1943, Page 5

Word Count
315

BEVERIDGE PLAN Evening Post, Volume CXXXV, Issue 18, 22 January 1943, Page 5

BEVERIDGE PLAN Evening Post, Volume CXXXV, Issue 18, 22 January 1943, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert