Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

USE OF UNIFORM

MAN'S RIGHT QUESTIONED

Described as a soldier and engraver, William Scholes, aged 51, appeared in the Supreme Court yesterday, in battle dress, for sentence on nine charges of false pretences. The Chief Justice (Sir Michael Myers) asked if any military officer was present who wished to say anything, and Mr. W. R. Birks, for the Crown, said he was informed that Scholes had now been discharged from the Army.

His Honour: .If he has been discharged from the Army he should not be in uniform.

Mr. Birks: Apparently that is the only clothing he has. The prisoner, who was on licence after having been previously declared a habitual criminal, was sentenced to eighteen months' hard labour on each charge, the terms to be concurrent.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19411008.2.76

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXXII, Issue 86, 8 October 1941, Page 8

Word Count
127

USE OF UNIFORM Evening Post, Volume CXXXII, Issue 86, 8 October 1941, Page 8

USE OF UNIFORM Evening Post, Volume CXXXII, Issue 86, 8 October 1941, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert