Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FARES BACK HOME

WHO SHOULD PAY?

MEN WHO LEFT WAIOURU CAMP JOB

Whether a worker engaged on country work who voluntarily leaves the work before its completion is entitled to be paid his return fare and to be paid for the time occupied in travelling home was a question put before Mr. J. A. Giimour, S.M., hi the Industrial Magistrate's Court today by way of an application by the Inspector of Awards for an interpretation of that question, according to the provisions of the New Zealand carpenters' and joiners award. The case concerned men who were engaged at Auckland for work at Waiouru Military Camp and who left before the completion of the job. The.. Magistrate reserved his decision.

Mr. J. Moulton, for .the union, argued that neither the employer nor the employee was compelled to maintain the worker's employment to the end of a country job, and that when an employer took a worker for country work he was virtually under contract to return the worker to his place of residence.

A PREVIOUS DECISION,

For the employers Mr. W. J. MountJoy contended that the award meant that workers were entitled to return fare only in the event of sickness or accident, ox once every three months. He further submitted that the question before the Court had already been decided in the Arbitration Court by Mr. Justice Frazer, who had 'held, in reply to a similar question, that a worker was entitled to his return fare only after he had been on the job three months and that a worker was not entitled to be paid for travelling time on the way home if he left a job before its completion, unless dismissed by the employer for any other reason than misconduct or incompetence.-

Mr. Mountjoy said that the company concerned was the Residential Construction Company , which . had employed 360 men at Waiouru, a somewhat isolated place, for approximately six weeks up to last Monday. About 16 per cent, of the men had left after working from three days to. five weeks. None of the men who left were paid travelling time or the return fare, except six who left, through illness. Before the men left Auckland they were handed a circular setting out the details and conditions of employment at Waiouru.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19400815.2.121

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXX, Issue 40, 15 August 1940, Page 13

Word Count
382

FARES BACK HOME Evening Post, Volume CXXX, Issue 40, 15 August 1940, Page 13

FARES BACK HOME Evening Post, Volume CXXX, Issue 40, 15 August 1940, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert