UNDEFENDED DIVORCE SUITS
The following decrees nisi, on the \ grounds stated, have been granted in > the Supreme Court by Mr., Justice j Smith in undefended petitions for j divorce: — j Leola Edna Burt (Mr. A. B. Sievwright) v. George Hardie Burt, noncompliance with order for restitution of conjugal rights; William WylieJames (Mr. W. B. Brown) v. Gwendoline Mavis Wylie-James, non-compli-ance with order for restitution of con- j jugal rights; Bert Webley (Mr. A. B. I; Sievwright) v. Mary Emily Webley, I desertion; Nathalie Jessie Carter (Mr; A. B. Sievwright) v. Gilbert Percival . Carter, habitual drunkenness, failure to maintain, and habitual cruelty; Ivy . Blanche Kempton (Mr. A. M. Hollings) ( V. John Thomas William Kempton, de- J(
sertion; Grace Virginia Prentice (Mr; A. B. Sievwright) v. Raymond John Prentice, adultery; Amelia May Whitley (Mr. A, B. Sievwright). v. George Edwin Clarence Whitley, separation; Frederick Olds (Mr. W. E. Leicester) V. Lizzie Olds, separation; Gladys de Bailleux (Mr. A. J. Mazengarb) v. Andre Gaston de Bailleux, adultery; William Phillips (Mr. G. C. Kent) v.i Marjorie Helen Phillips, separation; Winifred Mary Grace Evans (Mr. W. B. Brown) v. Henry Edward Evans, adultery; Elizabeth Pearson (Mr. A. J. Mazengarb) v. Hughie Francis Pearson, adultery; Janet Ellen Zinsli (Mr. A. B. Sievwright) v. Bernard Zinsli, separation; Ethel Marion Sandford (Mr. R. Hardie Boys) v. Albert John Sandford, separation; Sydney Charles Brereton (Mr. W. E. Leicester) v. Eunice Lorjraine Brereton, adultery; ' Bertha j Wright (Mr. W. E. Leicester) v. James 'Grey Lendrum.Wright, adultery; Agnes Maud Powell (Mr. J. B. Yaldwyn) v. William Cullen Powell, desertion; • Elsie Edna Gough (Mr. T. A. Tarjrant) v. Roland Alexander Gough, (adultery; Jack McGifford Cleland (Mr. iG. I. Joseph) v. Olga Jessie Cleland, ! non-compliance with restitution of conjugal rights; Mavis Vivian Maisey#Mr. A. J. Mazengarb) v. Stanley Charles Maisey, .desertion; _ Dorothy Maria Blackmore (Mr. A. J. Mazengarb) v. Ernest' Blackmore, separation; .Samuel Jukes (Mr.-A. J. Mazengirb) v. Mabel Emma- Jukes, separation j yena-tfoyce Hill (Mr. J. A. Scott) ' v.: Mghion •McLeod Hill,' ribn-cornpliaricevwith order for restitution of conjurai; rights. Decrees for restitution' of conjugal rights were granted in the fbllibWing cases:— ■■'.;_ .; :. ■■ ■ ■;.■:>,"..-, John Thomas Shacklock (Mr- Soloi™: D"nedin) v. Stewart Shacklock; I William Alexander O'Neiliv (Mr. A. •J. I Mazengarb) v. Mavis Lillian O'Neill; Aubrey George Edney (Mr. A. B. Si6vwnght) v.. Veronica Emily Edney.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19400803.2.17
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CXXX, Issue 30, 3 August 1940, Page 6
Word Count
382UNDEFENDED DIVORCE SUITS Evening Post, Volume CXXX, Issue 30, 3 August 1940, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.