Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUCKLAND DRIVERS

WELLINGTON MEETING

DISPUTES COMMITTEE ISSUE

The statement made yesterday by Mr. H. J. Knight, secretary of the New | Zealand Master Carriers' Federation and of the New, Zealand Road Transport Alliance-, regarding the Auckland matters in dispute under the New Zealand Drivers' Award, was replied to today by Mr. Andrew..Par lane, Wel-' lington, president of the New Zealand Drivers' Federation. "Mr. Knight denies that officials of the Auckland Union came to Wellington with the object of having the mat* ters in dispute referred to a disputes committee, as a result of prior agreement by the employers concerned," said Mr. Parlane. "I did not claim it was by prior agreement with the employers, concerned; I claim it was by a verbal arrangement between Mr. T, O, Bishop, Mr. Knight, ;and myself. The arrangement wag -: made per medium of the telephone,, hut 1 took a careful note in my diary of all thej conversation and a perusal of that Will show that both the gentlemen referred to were in favour of the matters in dispute being referred to a disputes committee, as provided for in the award.. A telegram was sent by me to the Auckland Drivers' Union to this effect, and it was responsible for the two representatives of. the Auckland Union coming to Wellington. "With regard to the.merits of the dispute, I have nothing to add to my. previous statement other than that the worker concerned rendered service to I the value of "over £1.1. lor which he [got no recognition. If Mr. Knight; thinks this is fair and equitable, he is entitled to his own opinion, but I think' that had the matter been referred to a disputes committee he .would have j found that a majority of that committee j .would'have held a:different opinion to] himself." . *. : --X . - - j

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19390704.2.112

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXVIII, Issue 3, 4 July 1939, Page 11

Word Count
301

AUCKLAND DRIVERS Evening Post, Volume CXXVIII, Issue 3, 4 July 1939, Page 11

AUCKLAND DRIVERS Evening Post, Volume CXXVIII, Issue 3, 4 July 1939, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert