Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

"Disgusted."—As the case referred to is still before the Arbitration. Court, comment is inadmissible.

"Casual Worker."—lf you can substantiate the statements, suggest you bring the facts under the notice of the union or the Minister in charge of the Department. It is difficult for a newspaper to investigate the position.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19390307.2.56

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXVII, Issue 55, 7 March 1939, Page 10

Word Count
53

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS. Evening Post, Volume CXXVII, Issue 55, 7 March 1939, Page 10

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS. Evening Post, Volume CXXVII, Issue 55, 7 March 1939, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert