Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

W. G. GRACE

BATSMAN & BOWLER

CRICKETER'S MEMORIES

Memories of Dr. W. G. Grace, the great English cricketer, are recalled by Lord George Scott in the "National Review." He writes: —

Without comparing him with more modern champions, W. G. Grace was for many years during the last thrae decades of the nineteenth century preeminent. He was universally regarded, and generally referred to, as "The Champion." I was a freshman at Oxford in 1880, and, owing to the kindness of M.'C. Kemp, was allowed to play for his M.C.C. XI against the 'Varsity in the last match played that season in the Parks. I, therefore, played in what may be considered a memorable cricket match. I was only one of many undergraduates who had never before seen W.G. batting, and when he advanced towards the wicket I personally wondered whether he was really so wonderful as he was said to be. His physique was splendid. He looked huge, and his large, dark beard gave him at first sight a dominating appearance, possibly lacking agility on account of his size. When he was facing the bowling his methods appeared to be simple. He gave a considerable uplift to his bat in a bee-line from the bowler's arm to his wicket. The bowling obviously gave him no trouble, and it was delightful to-sec how, when playing back* he put such power into his defensive strokes that, if the fillers failed to stop the ball, it generally went to the boundary.

A LIVELY WICKET.

The Parks wicket was generally a lively one, and I was personally more impressed by the way he treated the bumping balls than anything else in his play. When a ball got up high on his off stump or outside it, instead of leaving it alone he. appeared to tap ;it down the ground, ;■ generally to the boundary, as if he'could place each delivery as he liked. I had never seen anything like this, before.1 : It may; be permissible to give ray own first impressions of : the great man's bowling. With rather a lo|w action he seemed more to put the baU towards the wicket than to bowl in the conventional manner. I thought that his bowling looked easy for a quick-footed batsman, but he did What:he liked with the batsman that day, and this was probably where the snare lay. W.G. was:said at that tiitte to be the best change bowler in England. :i- "■". "";;■'.:" '■' - :- ' - " . i

I imagine1 that, given a fast wicket, he required a full-sized ground' even more than most .slow bowlers. And although he might be hit hard, and even frequently, his knowledge of the game and complete control of length enabled him to detect any weak spot in the batsman's armour. He took nearly 3000 wickets in his time. ' Whenever I had the pleasure of seeing W.G. batting I had the impression that he considered that his bat was to be used entirely as & weapon of offence. It was almost unknown for him to leave a ball alone.

Partly owing to his immensely powerful build, he could stand great punishment,when he was hit by fast bowling1 on his body. A few days after one match he showed hischest to a friend in the pavilion on the county ground at Bristol. His friend saw what' looked like six or seven black puddings round his heart.. W.G. said, "Although I am forty-eight in a couple,of.months, I don't mind how fast they send them down to me. They can chuck them if they like; the faster they are the better.

DISLIKED SLOW ONES

"It's the slow ones I don't like. I never did. I knew, how they ought to be played; but I was r never fluickfooted enough trf get bang 'out to them. 1" '

Although his best cricket days were before; i'the googly was invented, W.G. learnt .'to play cricket at the, time when shooters- were common, but shooters provided no terror for him.

It is probable that he derived; his suprerr)e batting efficiency from his remarkable physique and immense power, which in turn made it impossible for him to be quick-looted to the same degree as Jessop, who', could dash into the middle of a cricket pitch to any ball. Nevertheless, W.G. was, as a batsman, far nearer perfection than any man in the Victorian era; and there has never been anybody in the same pategory/ against fast !; bowling, for in his zenith he was a terror to all fast' bowlers even on bumping wickets.

W.G. was such a glorious figure on a cricket ground that when one arrived at Lord's and saw him at the wicket, it seemed almost too good to be true, especially when he proceeded to smite the ball in *11 directions. At the same time, when necessary, ha could show wonderful patience. ! :; :

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19371117.2.226

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXIV, Issue 120, 17 November 1937, Page 23

Word Count
799

W. G. GRACE Evening Post, Volume CXXIV, Issue 120, 17 November 1937, Page 23

W. G. GRACE Evening Post, Volume CXXIV, Issue 120, 17 November 1937, Page 23

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert