Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STATE TAXATION

COST TO FAMILIES

AVERAGE OF £76

Most taxpayers are fully aware that the usual figures relating to the amount of taxation paid per head of New Zealand's population are not effective as an index to the real amount paid by each individual, says a statement by the Associated Chambers of Commerce of New Zealand.

It is obvious that figures of national taxation, when expressing that taxation as an amount per head of the whole population, must inevitably take in men, women, and children; the wageearner, but also his dependants; the employed, but also the unemployed, the pensioners, the infirm, the prison population, and those either too young 'or too old to be breadwinners.- 1 For that reason many people are well aware that they are actually paying, in direct and indirect taxation, considerably more than the estimated amount of £19 3s taxation per head of population for the current financial year. The taxpayer consequently makes some conjectures as to the real amount of taxation he pays, .directly and indirectly. r It is, of course, impossible to get very far along this line. It is easy enough to sort out the fact that out of the whole of the Dominion's population' only 64,000 (1934-35 figures) pay income tax, but then everybody pays indirect taxes—which produce by far the greatest revenue. However, it is a step nearer to express total national taxation in. terms of the contribution made by. the average family of four persons. The following table, over the whole population, and covering a period of years, is drawn up on that basis:— Taxation Per Family. Amount. , Year. £ s. d. 1929-30 .' 52.14- 3 1930-31 ;' 50 8 4 1931-32 ...; 45 17 10 1932-33 5110,10 1933-34 ............ 55 14 3 1934-35 63 14 3 1935-36 , 65 3 1. 1930-37 .'....... *76 16 4 ■ . Naturally, these figures are average; one family will pay more and another less. Certain of the taxatjon is direct and certain indirect. To the figures in the above table are to be added local body taxation, which >vas equivalent to £15 11s per average family in 1934----35. ; - ■:■... ■ The reason for the considerable increases in national taxation it of course increased Government expenditure, which, for the current financial year, is equivalent to £105 15s per average family. In other words, national expenditure (from ordinary revenue and loan money) is now at the rate of over £ 2 per family per week. A prominent State official recently contended, in an address, that high expenditure and high taxation created various social benefits through the redistribution of income which they effected, but taxation which reaches an average of £76 per family is indefensible. It has become uneconomic and unjust.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19370217.2.68

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXIII, Issue 40, 17 February 1937, Page 10

Word Count
444

STATE TAXATION Evening Post, Volume CXXIII, Issue 40, 17 February 1937, Page 10

STATE TAXATION Evening Post, Volume CXXIII, Issue 40, 17 February 1937, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert