Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"NO SCANDAL"

LIEUT. DEWAR'S FRIENDSHIP

(Received November 18, 11.10 a.m.) SYDNEY, This Day.

Mr. Patcrson's statement regarding the identity of Mrs. Freer was in answer to a letter wr'4sn to him by Lieutenant Dewar in defence of Mrs. Freer in which he suggested that there might have been a mistake in identity, pointing out that there were two Mrs. Freers in Bombay.

Lieutenant Dewar in his letter to Mi-. Paterson set out "that there is no scandal in my friendship with Mrs. Freer in India," and that "the marriage you so strongly defend was not a success for various reasons. The marriage would have been ended suddenly in any case. The banning of Mrs. Freer has in no way helped the situation; in fact it has had the opposite effect."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19361118.2.89.2

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXII, Issue 121, 18 November 1936, Page 11

Word Count
130

"NO SCANDAL" Evening Post, Volume CXXII, Issue 121, 18 November 1936, Page 11

"NO SCANDAL" Evening Post, Volume CXXII, Issue 121, 18 November 1936, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert