Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE DEFENCE LEAGUE

(To the Editor.)

Sir. —Xour correspondent resents my disinclination to bring the soldier "private" under my condemnation of militarism. If he is a student of international affairs he will know that wars are not made so much by "privates" as by elder statesmen and army colonels, and that in,the main the unfortunate "private" has to do the slogging in the trenches and bear the brunt. My reference to the Defence League as being another type of Fascist organisation has been extended by your correspondent to include "Communist organisation." I said nothing of the sort, and "Jack Blunt" must have a weak case if he has to manufacture his own obstacles.

Your correspondent is unaware of a powerful wave of peace sentiment which is sweeping so many countries. It may surprise him to know that this sentiment is growing even, in militaristic countries. The ordinary man in France ,is opposed to war,' and the new Government nationalised armaments .as one means of curbing the power of the waif-makers. Ninety per cent, of newspapers in France are owned by armament firms. As regards Great Britain the peace ballot reveals the strong peace movement. The sentiment in Russia is all for peace, but the army is strong to resist German attacks. Germany is militaristic, although a large body of opinion is for peace. Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and-Holland are peace minded, as are America and Canada. The military party are in power in Italy and Germany, supported by the large industrialists, and hence the dictators are warlike. Again I repeat that the formation of a military party in New Zealand under the title of Defence League is undesirable and unnecessary. It is the duty of Governments and not of unofficial private organisations to arrange for adequate defence. The formation of leagues of a "military or semi-military' nature is a danger, as the tendency in other countries has been to supersede and not to co-operate with democratic governments.—l am. etC" ANTI-WAR.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19361007.2.150

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXII, Issue 85, 7 October 1936, Page 16

Word Count
329

THE DEFENCE LEAGUE Evening Post, Volume CXXII, Issue 85, 7 October 1936, Page 16

THE DEFENCE LEAGUE Evening Post, Volume CXXII, Issue 85, 7 October 1936, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert