Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"NOT IN ANGER BUT IN PITY"

"I sentence you not in anger but in pity," said Mr. Justice Smith in the Supreme Court today in imposing a term of four years' reformative detention upon Walter Bishop, aged 23, who pleaded guilty in the Magistrate's Courts in Pahiatua and Masterton to two charges of arson. His Honour- remarked that the charges referred to two farm houses. It was clear that the prisoner had had a very unfortunate life, and that he was sub-normal. "I must treat you for purposes of sentence," he said to the prisoner, "as a person who understands what he is doing, and who is responsible for his crimes within the meaning of the Crimes Act. I propose to sentence you to a long term so that your base may be investigated and if you are a proper subject for a mental hospital you may be sent there."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19360408.2.46

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXI, Issue 84, 8 April 1936, Page 8

Word Count
150

"NOT IN ANGER BUT IN PITY" Evening Post, Volume CXXI, Issue 84, 8 April 1936, Page 8

"NOT IN ANGER BUT IN PITY" Evening Post, Volume CXXI, Issue 84, 8 April 1936, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert