COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
(To the Editor.)
Sir,—During the recent Parliamentary elections, the National candidates for Wellington North and Wellington East, respectively, stated on several occasions that the New Zealand Alliance of Labour was opposed to the principle of compulsory arbitration. This statement was repeated quite recently by the secretary of the New Zealand Employers' Federation. Within the inner circles of the Industrial Labour movement the statements in question were treated as the product of the fertile imagination of the gentlemen referred to. That this view is correct is now proved by the fact that in your issue of the 3rd instant, Mr. Armstrong's Bill to restore compulsory arbitration received unqualified commendation from Mr> P. Butler, secretary of the Wellington, District Council of the*-New Zealand Alliance of Labour.—l am,'etc.,
A. PARLANE,
April 4.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19360406.2.67.2
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Issue 82, 6 April 1936, Page 8
Word Count
131
COMPULSORY ARBITRATION
Evening Post, Issue 82, 6 April 1936, Page 8
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in