Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE WRONG DEFENDANT

AW INSANITARY DRAIN

PUBLIC TRUST PROPERTY

(By Telegraph—Press Association.) AUCKLAND, November 11. "The Public Trustee has been extremely dilatory in attending to a matter affecting public health," said Mr. W. R. McKean,.S.M., in the Onehunga Magistrate's Court, when A. S. Faire, District Public. Trustee, was cited as the defendant in an information laid by the Manukau County Council, charging him with having failed to abate a nuisance on a property in Mangere. Evidence of the sanitary inspector for the Manukau County' Council showed that following an outbreak of scarlet fever, which had been traced to an overflowing cesspool on the property, the Health Department had ordered remedial measures to be taken. Witness said the property had been taken over by the Public Trustee, who had let the premises to tenants and had been collecting the rent The District Public Trustee had since June last been repeatedly warned to effect repairs to the drain, but had failed to do so until after the information had been laid. Counsel for the defence contended that neither Mr. Faire nor the Public Trustee was the owner of the property, but he admitted that the District Public Trustee was administering the estate as agent for the owner and was collecting rent. To effect repairs to the drain, he said, would be inconsistent with the powers of an agent a man named Platt being the real owner. The Magistrate held that the Public Trustee, Wellington, was the legal owner, who was defined by the Act as the person entitled to receive rent, whether on his own account or as agent of any other person. He considered, therefore, that the wrong person had been cited as defendant. The Magistrate was consequently unable to enter a conviction against the defendant, and dismissed the information.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19351112.2.24

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXX, Issue 116, 12 November 1935, Page 4

Word Count
299

THE WRONG DEFENDANT Evening Post, Volume CXX, Issue 116, 12 November 1935, Page 4

THE WRONG DEFENDANT Evening Post, Volume CXX, Issue 116, 12 November 1935, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert