Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A SELF-DENYING PRINCIPLE

With admirable candour Mr. A. Parlane, a Labour candidate for the City Council, declared at Wadestown: "I do not subscribe to reduction of rales. I believe it would pay to do more work out of revenue and less out of borrowed money. The latter system means two or three times the original cost." We may pass over the question whether this candid statement does not con-| flict with the policy of those of Mr. Parlane's fellow-candidates who are at present members of the council and have supported big loan schemes. We may pass over also the question whether Labour candidates who prefer revenue-spending to loan-raising should not look with friendly eye on the Local Government Loans Board which checks j borrowing but cannot check rateraising. Without considering these present pertinent aspects of the statement we are inclined to be sympathetic with Mr. Parlane's j theory. But what public support I could a City Council hope to obtain for such a self-denying policy, except (and this, after all, is largely | how Mr. Parlane applied it) as an illustration of how past councils have prevented future councils from spending freely? It is one thing to say, as Mr. Parlane said, that if past councils had kept borrowing I down so that capital charges would be half what they are now we could spend more today. It is something j quite different to tell the people who want .works done now that they must wait until they can be done with revenue. That involves either a high rate or a long wait. We have opposed some of the past loans; but we are not prepared now to advocate the sudden adoption of a Spartan regime. Higher rating would check rising recovery and therefore it should be avoided. But if there are works of urgency and value that can be carried out at low cost and on advantageous loan terms the community can prudently pledge a little of the future revenue to gain an immediate benefit. Muchdepends on the value and permanency of the works.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19350427.2.44

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXIX, Issue 98, 27 April 1935, Page 8

Word Count
344

A SELF-DENYING PRINCIPLE Evening Post, Volume CXIX, Issue 98, 27 April 1935, Page 8

A SELF-DENYING PRINCIPLE Evening Post, Volume CXIX, Issue 98, 27 April 1935, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert