Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SEAS THAT ARE FREE, AND OTHER SEAS

As non-American shipping is not allowed to participate in ' the trade between Honolulu and the United States, it wquld be equal justice if American shipping were not allowed to participate in, the trade between New Zealand, Australia, and Fiji. It is plain, therefore, that the United States Government would have no; moral or legal right to protest against the adoption by New Zealand and Australia (Dominions) and by Fiji (Crown Colony) of a policy of which the Americans are the authors. It is also asserted, and seems to be a fact, that legislation by a Dominion on shipping matters is not invalid in the absence of . the Royal Assent. A generation ago, when New Zealand proposed to legislate against P. and O. (British) steamers that began to call at Auckland employing lowly-paid lascars (British subjects), the Royal Assent stood in the way; but times have changed, the two cases do not resemble each other, and the Imperial legal system, it is stated, presents no legal bar to joint action by New Zealand and Australia protective of British ' shipping against United States shipping. What, then, is the bar? Evidently the bar is expediency. St. Paul's saying, "All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient," was a favourite maxim of a late English statesman. Expediency, looking into high politics, looking into the future, and looking to the possibilities of markets in America and particularly looking into the future of the Pacific and the racial problems lurking there, hesitates to do unto the United Slates what the United States has done unto us. But there arc on the other hand people who hold that no Government respects a Government that fears to repay in kind. The pase for action to defend our shipping is definite; the case against is indefinite. With the two heads of the Government going to London, and Australia's Prime Minister already there, cannot some attempt be made, in conference with Imperial authorities, to cut this knot?

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19350402.2.38

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXIX, Issue 78, 2 April 1935, Page 8

Word Count
338

SEAS THAT ARE FREE, AND OTHER SEAS Evening Post, Volume CXIX, Issue 78, 2 April 1935, Page 8

SEAS THAT ARE FREE, AND OTHER SEAS Evening Post, Volume CXIX, Issue 78, 2 April 1935, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert