Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A. AND P. SHOWS

EXCLUSION POWERS

AMENDING BILL

i For an, hour and a. half, yesterday j I afternoon, the House of Eepresentativcs debated the Agricultural and Pastoral Societies Amendment Bill, the second' reading of which1 was moved- by the Minister of Agriculture (the Hon. C* . E. MacmilJan). The measure give* j A. and: P. Societies authority to mak»; bylaws regulating admissions to shows,; and it .was stated by; the Government j that the object of the Bill was mainly]; to control sideshowmen.'The; only'Oppo-i sition was expressed b.y'members of: the Labour Party, who claimed that »uf• | ficient legislative authority abeady.ex. j isted :for the control of eideshowmen..

, The debate was continued after ••The i Post" went to press. . • • : Mr. J. Linklater (Government, Maua-j watu) congratulated 'the Minister of j Agriculture in bringing forward the ■'. Bill. Taken as a whole the showmen, were law-abiding people* but there were j some who should be excluded for the i good of the people. Mr. F. W. Schramm (Labour, Auek-j land East) said everyone agreed that' undesirables should ;be banned front shows, bui the Bill went much further than- that. It gave the A. and• •P. Societies the right to exclude almost apyj person whatever. •:'■"-.-.'■ > Mr. B. Semple (Labour, Wellington East) said that the law given to th» racing people had been abused, and tf« did not want a repetition ,of that., , The Prhne Minister- (the -Bt. Hpni G. W. Forbes) said that the A. and P. Associations were desirous of -making their show grounds as popular is possible. The proposed bylaws had to be approved by tho Governor-General, ana that was a safeguard, ■as the: bylaws would be isubijeet to Berutiny, He thought-the Bill was a safe -One,^ and | "one that was required; ' r^ : j The Leader of the Opposition (Mr. H. E. Holland) agreed that the public should" have protection. •' However, iHi the Police Offences Act and other, stati utes there was adequate protection^' He was desirous that no power eiinilar, to that given to the Eacing Conference should be bestowed on A. and P. So-1 cieties. ... Eeplying, the Minister of Agncultura (the Hon. C. E. Macmillan) saidthere was no "niggerin the woodpile" in th« Bill. There was io provision-for KeenBing showmen in existing legislation. The Bill was read a second time.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19331007.2.301

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 85, 7 October 1933, Page 25

Word Count
380

A. AND P. SHOWS Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 85, 7 October 1933, Page 25

A. AND P. SHOWS Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 85, 7 October 1933, Page 25

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert