Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUCKLAND v. HAMILTON.

Some big, heavy men took the field in the. clash between the Auckland and Hamilton Marist teams, which was staged '. simultaneously with the Wellington Marist .A-Napier Marisfc fixture. The Auckland ; team, the present holders of the Spillane Cup, were successful by 8 points to nil. Two well-known and prominent players— S. Hadley and-C Hadley—were members of the Auckland combination. Generally speaking, both teams kept going well, the two packs having some solid exchanges, with. the. backs coming in now and again. ..The-handling of the rearguards, however, was not clean. '. The final score was not exaqtly a- true index of the run of the play. The Hamilton team several times was decidedly unlucky in not putting on points. Territorially they had the better of the second spell. Good chances.came their way, but something always went wrong at the "psychological moment, and they were ■unable to make the most of them. in a handy position, Muller .drop-kicked a goal and gave Auckland a start with three- points; The spell ended ■ -without any addition to the score. Early ■in the second'half Hamilton, with a strong .--fHsh, seemed to have a good chance of f coring, ibut luck was against them. A Sweeping rush by the Auckland forwards fcrought success, S. Hadley going over for ;6 try in the corner. Elliott took the kick; -It was not an easy one, but with a fine ".effort lie goaled. Auckland 8, Hamilton rp. The. Hamilton men again reasserted ..themselves, and for the. most part were ::jtne aggressors until the end of the game.

Chances came- their'way,, and once or twice they were within an ace of scoring, but each time success did not favour them. Auckland were the winners by 8 'points to nil.

The referee was Mr. D. G. Paris.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19320328.2.135.3

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 73, 28 March 1932, Page 14

Word Count
298

AUCKLAND v. HAMILTON. Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 73, 28 March 1932, Page 14

AUCKLAND v. HAMILTON. Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 73, 28 March 1932, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert