Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE OTHER SIDE

FRUIT STAND QUESTION

STATEMENT FROM HINDUS

In the absence of the president' of the'.\lndjah Association" of iWeilington'y • Sir. K. Vellabh has ;nVade a. statement, in Teply to the protesti;of !.th'e Frurbsellers and Shopkeepers' 'Associations^ against the -"leasing of street fruit stands to Hindu barrowmen.

"It lias; been stated," said Mr.!! Vellabh, "that our methods: of:tradej are unfair, and that we should be done away with. I say that isi nbtrfair^ —riot, the good justice of the British .raj, and I say, too, that some statements' made were not true.

'.sWhat is the position? We come here ; under your own«laws. The City Council] advertises an auction js.Jtle of street' Btainds every quarter.--3Ct;^s open forVatll, -tojattend and bidV We;-attend' and b'ld'i ipj c those1 stands^i^e pay high prices-^r! :i"n' some• cases. f£s' and £6, a week: fjbr! the privilege" at standing on windyi street corners.in-all weathers. K'l'v

"Not only do we pay heavily, but I we have to pay the. whole of our quarter's ( rent in cash on the fall of the , hammer,'" -as well 'as ' pa^'-f or *"a| licence. How ni^ny shoipkeepe'rs in.; Wellington pay a'tiuafter's.-rent in ad-j vanes?- - ' . .%:/ ' 'xv ' ' ' >

.■JiSpbie' things^jh'ijve been said that! afefuntrue.' Ono;'s^aker?f<)r the depu-1 tatibii to the Ci.ty" CQu^tfeil's,health! committee t sayf-^tKat shopkeepers had1, to, keep the|r 'fruit properly protected! back from the doors. He knows, as well: as the , public 'that nearly every ', fruit1 and vegetable shopkeeper, .in Welling-; ton exhibit^,fruit and vegetables' in .^lie; lppW otftsideKJy^shcip: doors.;, ThereJis jin;; old ;l?ng!iSi'Vpr^rerbi,wl)icli,' say.s. 'Liye.a'ud let'live,'and it''is hard'for us if, when: we come,in and obey all your laws and, trade fairly under them," ■we cannot be let alone. Our lot is not an' enviable' one at' the best, but- it is not what you call'^ playing the game Kit, you make laws, under which we ', can, trade and then knock, them down ;to' suit a few people with, whom ,we .are, necessarily in competition.?': ~ ,■ : aiOHTS OF MXWIOIPAiITIBS.

"Observer'' writes to>"The 'Post' * as; follows:—-'/ Considerable 'discussion and- correspondence has ! taken place during the last-three or' four' years in Wellington in respect;' to permits ; giyen ,to fruit vendors to occupy certain stands in public streets for the purpose of selling fruit at such Btands-^this does not' refer to street hawkers travelling round from .house T;to house.'' s ?s leCiy?aS?»:ago; similar.^tanjls,. in Mother!' towns were ; leased, and in one case, in^ Chriatchurch, the" police" compelled a., fruit vendor to move away from a corner, .for which: he had a:permit, on the; ground that' the stand was a dangerous obstruction. "■ The fruit .vendor in. this case had paid a fairly stiff fee for his permit, so he took Court action to recover from r th'e City Coun-i cil the' amount- he liad< paid. The-Court .decided in favour of the1 fruit vendor j holding that: the City Council had no authority, to let or lease; any part ; of a public: street, road, or public thoroughfare for such purpose. The.writer is in no ; way interested ;in the..question from a business point, of view, but. as. a ratepayer I may: say that I; consider such fruit vending Btands as "those at; .the General Post Office and in some of the busy 'streets •: are , frequently, obstructions to ordinary city, traffic, as well as being untidy and at : time's unhealthy." ; .'--: ". v - . ; ;■'..■■ ; ; -'/,' ~ The point made" by the correspondent -regarding tl^e*;rigli,t pf itheiikunicipality to giye space iights'^n 'the:streets was mentioned .during ithe hearing':of: the deputation.' iotheiHealth .Committee of the; council,' and*it was'stated by the City Solicitor:■that the- Municipal Cor^: poratiori Act gave such poirersl ' All stands are reported"upon:by the Traffic Department and hone' are permitted in ..positions where, in the opinion •of .the Officers,! ;dangei?, ; or Obstruction" ina^? be caused.'Only -very recently >s" start!'was cancelled, because of traffic complications. ' ' '■'.-■ , . ■ :■',■

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19320130.2.20

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 25, 30 January 1932, Page 7

Word Count
625

THE OTHER SIDE Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 25, 30 January 1932, Page 7

THE OTHER SIDE Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 25, 30 January 1932, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert