Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

"Hai-d Up."—As there is ;i protective! turilT on woollen itoods in Australia it would be futllo to protest litre. "Householder."—Thcro lm» I"1"1 ." >'™, tc, st against this suggestion, ami It is unlikely that it will lie accepted. Jus Hunter.—Such sweepinK statements, without tletluite proof, would only provoke dissension.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19311031.2.62

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 106, 31 October 1931, Page 12

Word Count
50

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS. Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 106, 31 October 1931, Page 12

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS. Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 106, 31 October 1931, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert