FAIRNESS IN HOUSING
The Rent Restriction Act now applies to fewer dwellings than when it was originally passed, except for the special provision for the Hawkes Bay earthquake area. The practical objection to its extension is therefore less on the scpre of unfairness to individual property-owners. But there remains the undeniable objection that any such restrictive legislation frightens investors who would otherwise enter the business of house provision. When the House of Representatives discussed the Rent Restriction Extension Bill on Tuesday night
there was less tendency than formerly lo pillory the landlord. One Labour member even Conceded that
"hardship was also suffered by those who were dependent on rents for their living." If lliis altitude had been adopted ten years ago and if there had been less disposition to hold the letthig-owner up as a target for abuse the position would now be much better for all tenants. When will it be recognised that the interests of good tenants are best served by encouraging house-letting instead of subjecting it to restrictions and treating the landlord as if he were a hard-hearted, grasping profiteer, entitled to no return from his investment? ■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19310730.2.45
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 26, 30 July 1931, Page 12
Word Count
190FAIRNESS IN HOUSING Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 26, 30 July 1931, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.